Question

http://prntscr.com/psr4rt

Answer 1

@dude @Shadow

Answer 2

@mhchen where'd you go lol

Answer 3

@misty34

Answer 4

Looks good

Answer 5

http://prntscr.com/psrd31

Answer 6

I helped you with that one

Answer 7

oh yes sorry

http://prntscr.com/psrfih

Answer 8

@mhchen

Answer 9

https://questioncove.com/study#/updates/5dc059535c1400ef9c6ea400

Answer 10

oh so it would be SSS?

Answer 11

Yeah

Answer 12

http://prntscr.com/psrpnn

Answer 13

@dude ??

Answer 14

Okay so they defined an angle and the bisecting line for you

The first blank corresponds to a bisecting angles theorem (Use the angles opposite to the ones just proven)

Answer 15

[You should have ASA]

Answer 16

so D

Answer 17

Yeah

Answer 18

http://prntscr.com/psrw4f

Answer 19

@mhchen

Answer 20

@Gdeinward

Answer 21

@dude guys can you help me please I need to get on something new

Answer 22

We have 2 given congruent angles

Because we know that CE is bisecting, we can use the reflexive property to define it as a side

2 angles
1 side

Answer 23

soo AAS?

Answer 24

or ASA?

Answer 25

AAS is not a postulate

It doesnt exist

Answer 26

got it so ASA

http://prntscr.com/pss99u

Answer 27

For that one you need to prove that angle N is congruent on both sides

*Also note reflexive property, so it has to be the same angle just rewritten*

Answer 28

Im thinking C..im not sure

Answer 29

No, they have to be the same angle

Answer 30

but the one under it is the same

Answer 31

Oh that's weird

It isn't either of those, it was probably a typo

Retrace the angles

**Or use the hint that you have to prove angle N**

Answer 32

okay and are these right

http://prntscr.com/psshq3

Answer 33

Yeah