Would it be possible to have a socialist direct democracy?

A. No, in a socialist society only a few high-ranking members of the communist party have political power.
B. No, a direct democracy requires a free market economy which is not socialist.
C. Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.
D. Yes, if the society was ruled by a king who made the majority of economic decisions, it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

Question

Would it be possible to have a socialist direct democracy?

A. No, in a socialist society only a few high-ranking members of the communist party have political power.
B. No, a direct democracy requires a free market economy which is not socialist.
C. Yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.
D. Yes, if the society was ruled by a king who made the majority of economic decisions, it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

Isry · Answer

What do you think?

gababb09 · Answer

I tink it might be C but I'm not sure

Isry · Answer

That’s correct. Here’s why a direct democracy‘s are also known as pure democracy’s pure democracy’s are where every citizen has a vote and they vote on everything do United States is not a pure democracy we vote for the president and elected officials but we do not voteOn everything socialism is the idea that everyone gets the same treatment exactly the same treatment so therefore a socialistic direct democracy is possible

gababb09 · Answer

thanks

Isry · Answer

Apologies for the grammatical errors that was done using talk to text.