What forensic professionals should NOT be involved in the investigation of the Chinese-drywall incident?

1. toxicologists
2. computer specialists
3. engineers
4. chemists

Question

What forensic professionals should NOT be involved in the investigation of the Chinese-drywall incident?

1. toxicologists
2. computer specialists
3. engineers
4. chemists

Vocaloid · Answer

Moved to Chemistry. I have also modified the question to include the answer choices.

Mercury · Answer

I believe it is referring to an incident ~2006-2007 when people were complaining about bad smells/health issues that started happening with certain Chinese drywalls

according to my research, these problems were caused by the corrosion of sulfur compounds releasing harmful gases like carbon disulfide, carbonyl sulfide, and hydrogen sulfide.

with that being said, any thoughts as to which professionals should/shouldn't be involved? as a major hint, chemists and toxicologists are both relevant to the case, and should be involved. so you should think between computer specialists and engineers to see who would be less relevant.

Mercury · Answer

references: https://www.cpsc.gov/safety-education/safety-education-centers/drywall-information-center/where-has-problem-drywall-been-reported https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/chinese-drywall-problems-health-effects-32402.html https://www.popularmechanics.com/home/how-to/a4884/4336471/