Ask your own question, for FREE!
Politics 17 Online
justus:

Imagine you are a juror in a criminal case in which a defendant is charged with robbing a party store.

justus:

@Shadow Kindly help me out here.

justus:

question is: Rank the most important #1 and least important #4. Justify why you ranked the evidence in the order that you did

darkknight:

I would say that DNA analysis the most important because it is accepted as definitive evidence. and that u can actually prove that

justus:

thanks for helping, I might need further explaintion

Shadow:

The metric you're looking at is what evidence can identify the robber. How intrinsic is someone's back to them being identifiable. It's something but compared to DNA? Probably not. And eyewitness testimony of the person who was robbed? Seems important no? The last one sounds like hearsay, which would get a quick objection in court.

justus:

Ah ah I see

Shadow:

Got your list? (:

justus:

for what?

darkknight:

for this

Shadow:

Ranking the evidence most important to least^

justus:

is it 1.DNA 2.eye witness 3. Security camera footage 4. Neighbor’s testimony.

Shadow:

Yes

justus:

Thank you :)

Shadow:

Then just provide your justifications. Let me know if you want me to check those.

justus:

Okay I appreciate it

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!