Question

which scenario best describes a federal court applying the principle of precedent?
A. a defendant convicted of a federal crime appeals to the supreme court, but his request is denied
B. a judge in a U.S. court of appeals overturns a defendants conviction on grounds of that the law she violated is unconstitutional

C. a court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses
D. a federal judge finds a criminal defendant not guilty because she believes his case should have been tried in a state court

Answer 1

The principle of precedent is the idea that a previous legal case is either binding, or persuasive for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar facts. The concept allows courts to yield predictable and consistent results. This is one of the most important values of common-law legal systems. In this case, the fact that earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses is very significant for the court's subsequent decision to allow segregated bathrooms. C

Answer 2

ur that creep who forced a girl on a zoom call and you were like 30

Answer 3

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @BestBoiKirby
ur that creep who forced a girl on a zoom call and you were like 30
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
hes not 30, i did a vc with him ystrdy, ano HE DID NOT FORCE ME

Answer 4

ok ok ok ok

Answer 5

was she overreacting, he's really not a preadator

Answer 6

ya, no hes not, he just wants to talk, hes bored

Answer 7

drama~