Which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as "evidence"?
A.
anthology
B.
encyclopedia
C.
historical novel
D.
monograph
E.
textbook

Question

Which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as "evidence"?
A. 
anthology
B. 
encyclopedia
C. 
historical novel
D. 
monograph
E. 
textbook

Extrinix · Answer

@F22Raptor what do you think the answer is?

F22Raptor · Answer

@Extrinix I dont know

Extrinix · Answer

Think of which ones are $\color{teal}{history~related}$

F22Raptor · Answer

is it c

Extrinix · Answer

Can't tell you the answer, you have to make the decision yourself

Extrinix · Answer

@Pxsze we aren't suppose to give the answers out.

Extrinix · Answer

Still considered as an answer.

Pxsze · Answer

kinda doesnt make sense it was just a guess but ok

Pxsze · Answer

no matter how many times i read the rules my opinion is my opinion :l

Extrinix · Answer

@F22Raptor find all of the answers which contain $historical~information$, then from those decide which can't be used as $evidence$ in something like a $DBQ~(Essay~/~Document~Based~Question)$