Alexa01:
Some scientists think we should be spending time and money developing vaccines for diseases that may in the future become pandemics, so that we are ready when they come. Other scientists think time and money is better spent on working on vaccines for very rare diseases that infect humans currently. If you were in charge of distributing money to vaccine researchers, who would you be more likely to give money to, someone studying a disease that may (or may not) become a pandemic, or someone studying rare diseases that people currently are infected with? Explain your choice.
TETSXPREME:
Do you have any clue ?
TETSXPREME:
i would give you my opinion if that may help?
Alexa01:
please give your own opinion
TETSXPREME:
I would give the money to scientist to discover more things about the world that we have no idea about, it could also save our lives because if something comes Like the covid19 we could be ready to deal with it and we won't have it out of hand and we could control it and explore the virus happen or how it got here which would lead to more things.
Alexa01:
Thank you
TETSXPREME:
Your Welcome C:
TETSXPREME:
Well since you have your question answered could you close this ? C:
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
addison123456:
I have a quote that will hit hard but someone needs to tell me what it means. "I am not crying over you.
breiadabrattzz:
Do anyone know how to use Canva and do like personal photos for UNT Denton and in
xXAikoXx:
Can peanut oil cause allergic reactions to someone with a peanut allergy?
gelphielvr:
How does a person's community (where they are from, who they surround themselves with, their u201cpeopleu201d, etc.
Nina001:
I need ideas on what religion I should do on my history project and some good facts.