Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6:10.

A multiplication table.

Which statement explains whether Juliana is correct?
She is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio.
She is correct because 6:10 can be written as 1:2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1:2.
She is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10.
She is not correct because 6:10 is equivalent to 3:5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3:5.

Question

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6:10.

A multiplication table.

Which statement explains whether Juliana is correct?
She is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio.
She is correct because 6:10 can be written as 1:2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1:2.
She is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10.
She is not correct because 6:10 is equivalent to 3:5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3:5.