Let's say, you and your sister had a child. What would be the effect of having a baby on your sister, and what would be the effect on the baby?

Question

BrokenMoon · Answer

how old is she?

NeverAlone · Answer

Dear god. Let's say old enough to drink. 21.

JuniorRozier · Answer

According to genetics.thetech.org - The risk for passing down a genetic disease is much higher for siblings than first cousins. To be more specific, two siblings who have kids together have a higher chance of passing on a recessive disease to their kids.

axie · Answer

uhhhhhhhhhh

axie · Answer

suss

axie · Answer

NA got some one progognaut

NeverAlone · Answer

Basically the baby wouldn't develop correctly?

NeverAlone · Answer

@axie wrote:

NA got some one progognaut

DID NOT!

axie · Answer

@neveralone wrote:

@axie wrote:

NA got some one progognaut

DID NOT!

DID TOO

BrokenMoon · Answer

incest first. GOD NO.  so babies are purposly not born that way because not only is it 1, NASTY but 2, the baby wont be healthy, tewo people who are related so closely shouldnt have children because there is a very very high risk for genetic disease, miscarriages, and deformaties

Astro · Answer

@neveralone wrote:

Basically the baby wouldn't develop correctly?

Basically yes. But this should never happen anyway.

NeverAlone · Answer

@axie wrote:

@neveralone wrote:

@axie wrote:

NA got some one progognaut

DID NOT!

DID TOO

Shush up Axie >:[

axie · Answer

@neveralone wrote:

@axie wrote:

@neveralone wrote:

@axie wrote:

NA got some one progognaut

DID NOT!

DID TOO

Shush up Axie >:[

no

JuniorRozier · Answer

there is a very high risk of genetic disease to occur on the child

NeverAlone · Answer

@brokenmoon wrote:

incest first. GOD NO. so babies are purposly not born that way because not only is it 1, NASTY but 2, the baby wont be healthy, tewo people who are related so closely shouldnt have children because there is a very very high risk for genetic disease, miscarriages, and deformaties

Is it dangerous to the people that have the baby, or to the baby itself?

BrokenMoon · Answer

@neveralone wrote:

Basically the baby wouldn't develop correctly?

correct, it would be incredibly unhealthy when its born and thats IF it survives

BrokenMoon · Answer

@neveralone wrote:

@brokenmoon wrote:

incest first. GOD NO. so babies are purposly not born that way because not only is it 1, NASTY but 2, the baby wont be healthy, tewo people who are related so closely shouldnt have children because there is a very very high risk for genetic disease, miscarriages, and deformaties

Is it dangerous to the people that have the baby, or to the baby itself?

I would say more to the baby, but it can be dangerous to the people to, mentally at least

JuniorRozier · Answer

MORAL OF THE STORY!
DONT HAVE KIDS WITH YOUR SISTER!
THATS WEIRD AND GROSS AND IMMORAL-

NeverAlone · Answer

^ I agree with that

Astro · Answer

@juniorrozier wrote:

MORAL OF THE STORY! DONT HAVE KIDS WITH YOUR SISTER! THATS WEIRD AND GROSS AND IMMORAL-

They didn't ask for your opinion they asked for help on the question, keep it on topic.

NeverAlone · Answer

Thank you. I was curious of what would happen. No nothing bad happened.

Astro · Answer

Sure :>

JuniorRozier · Answer

igh