Question

Which piece of evidence is most relevent to this claim and supporting reason? ( Children should not be allowed to play football because they often get head injuries while playing.) A. Over 1 million teenagers play high school football each year. B. There is no proof that football leads to long terms negative effects. C. Many professional football players suffer brain damage from playing. D. About 2 percent of high school athletes become professional.

Answer 1

@midnitesunny

Answer 2

Which one is restating the question?

Answer 3

Or providing information about the passage.

Answer 4

D

Answer 5

C

Answer 6

O dear, the subject should be English, not Mathematics.
With this one, you just gotta see which one seems to make the most sense within the context of the given sentence.
A) Over 1 million teenagers play high school football each year.
Okay but who cares? Doesn't have a thing to do with head injuries.
B) There is no proof that football leads to long terms negative effects.
This one is directly contradicting the statement, so no.
C) Many professional football players suffer brain damage from playing.
This one would be correct. It directly relates to head injuries.
D) About 2 percent of high school athletes become professional.
This one has nothing to do with head injuries, so no.

Answer 7

thanks it is mathometic because it won't let me pick the subject i need help on

Answer 8

Well that's odd. Anyways, though, best of luck again <3