I'm not that good at law can someone fact check this without bias?
June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Chatrie v. United States. The Court held that obtaining someone's location history is a Fourth Amendment search. Flock cameras similarly collect and store vehicle-location information, along with where you walk, bike, etc., meaning Flock is violating our Fourth Amendment rights.
Because Flock obtains this location information illegally, police cannot use evidence obtained from Flock cameras against you. Any evidence gathered through an unconstitutional search should be excluded from court under the Fourth Amendment.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
JohnnyLFowler0812:
@twaylor wrote:
I'm not that good at law can someone fact check this without bias?
June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Chatrie v. United States. The Court held that obtaining someone's location history is a Fourth Amendment search. Flock cameras similarly collect and store vehicle-location information, along with where you walk, bike, etc., meaning Flock is violating our Fourth Amendment rights.
Because Flock obtains this location information illegally, police cannot use evidence obtained from Flock cameras against you. Any evidence gathered through an unconstitutional search should be excluded from court under the Fourth Amendment.
I'm not sure about that, as going out in public, you can be recorded by anyone, and the video can be posted if they find that they want to. its like those Karen videos... I'll have to look deeper into it first