Ask
your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics
13 Online
solve 2t < 3 + 2t I thought it would not be solvable since I came up with 0 < 3 what am I doing wrong?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Is 0 less than 3?
that inequality always holds for all real t. :)
Essentially what happened was that you found the inequality to be true regardless of what t is, therefore all values for t are solutions.
Thanks, I thought since t canceled itself out that it was unsolvable. Thanks again.
It means it will either have no solutions, or all solutions depending on the truth/falsity of the statement. If it had said 0 > 3 then it would be false for all values of t.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
And would have no solutions.
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
DoltonCarlee:
what are y'all's options on S A T essays because honestly their not that bad
thereneelg:
Can someone give me a summary of article 231, The war guilt clause?? I need to explain what it is, but I can't find any shortened version of what it is and
luisaam2:
What should you do when the person you want to talk to the most is the one making
Breathless:
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/nAYivIl6oXB6q9QAI?invite=cr-MSxCSk4sMTY4OTA4N
Twaylor:
I'm not that good at law can someone fact check this without bias? June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Chatrie v.
Demon25:
For a hoco proposal with a cheerleader and football player, what else should be a
1 day ago
4 Replies
2 Medals
2 days ago
7 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
16 Replies
1 Medal
1 week ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 week ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 week ago
12 Replies
0 Medals