0 there exists a natural number N such that |a_n-c|=N."/> 0 there exists a natural number N such that |a_n-c|=N."/> 0 there exists a natural number N such that |a_n-c|=N."/> 0 there exists a natural number N such that |a_n-c|=N."/>
Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 25 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

a real sequence (a_n) converges to "c", iff for each e>0 there exists a natural number N such that |a_n-c|=N. Can we define this the other way round? like, (a_n) converges to "c" iff for any natural number N there exists a positive real e, such that for all n>=N |a_n-c|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can u elaborate please

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm...actually ignore all that, thats wrong. Thats not the reason why you cant switch the order. Its because you can have an epsilon that satisfies the statement for every N, but the sequence could still be divergent. For example: 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, .... For every N, i can claim my limit is .5, and make epsilon = 1. Then the statement: \[(\forall N)(\exists \epsilon) (n\ge N \Rightarrow |a_n-c|<\epsilon)\] is true (each a_n is in between (.5-1, .5+1) = (-.5, 1.5)), but the sequence doesnt converge.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!