Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 21 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Anyone know if I can say ~p v r v ~q v r is equivalent to (~p v ~q) v r? Trying to make it equal to p -->(q v r)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

v is associative and commutative. Also r v r = r. (I'm assuming v is union, or the OR boolean operator.)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So, yes, they are equivalent. But I don't think they're equivalent to the implication you proposed.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!