Proving that the following is not a vector space: First octant of (x,y,z) space. I figured that it's not a vector space, but I can't figure out what properties other than the additive inverse property that it fails. Everything else seems to be right.
It's sufficient that any property fail. Call the octant E. The fact that v in E does not imply v in E is sufficient for E not to be a subspace. For the record, scalar multiplication also fails if the scalar is negative.
THANKYOUU. ;_____; I kept going in circles through the list of properties and couldn't figure out what else it failed. It's a multi choice answer and I'm supposed to pick all the properties that it fails. I didn't understand what you meant by "The fact that v in E does not imply v in E is sufficient for E not to be a subspace." though. I'm not familiar enough with vectors and vector spaces to pick out good counter cases x-x;
Take (1,1,1). Then the vector (-1,-1,-1) is not in E
By the way, is the definition of E that all the ordinates are positive? If so, then the zero vector isn't in E either.
Nope, it wasn't defined to be positive. My previous question asking about if they were all positive was just to see if I could figure it out on my own :c cause I kept second guessing and wondering if there was any way to add two vectors together to get something that was outside the octant. E is 0 inclusive, so it did have a zero vector. But yea! Understood.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!