A common inhabitant of human intestines is the bacterium Escherichia coli. A cell of this bacterium in a nutrient-broth medium divides into two cells every 20 minutes. The initial population of a culture is 63 cells. Find the rate of growth after 8 hours. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
I know that \[p(t) = 63 e^{2.07944*t}\] And I know that there are 1056964608 cells after 8 hours. This is driving me nuts. I've been trying to figure out what rate of growth means. Relative rate of growth is easy, but this... so frustrated....
What I mean when I say, "i know that.." from above, is that I figured it out. Although I am certain my math is correct. So the above values are right.
i got the other one i believe in the end lol
"medium divides into two cells every 20 minutes. The initial population of a culture is 63" 20min = 1/3 hr 3 ln(2) = r then so after 8 hours that should be: A = 63 e^(8*3ln(2)) = 1.05696461 × 10^9
thats not the rate of growth tho, thats the population size
the rate of growth is the derivative of the function when t=8 i believe
A = 63 e^(3ln(2)*t) A' = 3ln(2)*63 e^(3ln(2)*t)
there would have been a t' but t'=1 with respect to itself so we tend to toss it out
2197896113.96054.... http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=3ln%282%29*63+e^%283ln%282%29*8%29
hopefully that makes sense ....
No idea what you did here, "20min = 1/3 hr 3 ln(2) = r then so after 8 hours that should be:" I just assumed t was in hours. Made it much simpler.
If i understand correctly, you did not assume t was in hours, but rather t=20min? If so, how did you get 3 ln(2)=r?
Nevermind ^^. I realized you weren't calculating rate of growth.
i tapped into a trick I recall that continuous things have a doubling effect every ln(2)/k where k is either the rate of the time depending on which one you need, ln(2)/r = time ln(2)/t = rate since 1/3 of an hour is the time it takes to double; the rate itself is 3 ln(2)
the rate OR the time ... accursed typos
I think you're approaching this from a different way than I am supposed to. It might eventually lead to the same conclusion, but.. here let me paste the ENTIRE question.
it might be (rt)' in the derivative ... but im pretty sure since its a constant that it kinda takes care of itself. k
There were 4 parts to this question. I got 3 of them correct. (a) Find the relative growth rate. (Assume t is measured in hours.) (b) Find an expression for the number of cells after t hours. (c) Find the number of cells after 8 hours (d) Find the rate of growth after 8 hours. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) (e) When will the population reach 20,000 cells? (Round your answer to two decimal places.) D is the only one I cannot get. I don't think we are supposed to use what you referred to as 'the doubling rule'. Which i think is just the 'Rule of 72' : ln(2)/ln(1+r)
Don't work out a, b, c, e above by the way. Web assign said I got them right so no need for checking.. And i meant to say there are 5 parts to this question, i got 4 correct. heh
2P = Pe^(rt) 2P/P = e^(rt) 2 = e^(rt) ln(2) = ln(e^(rt)) ln(2) = rt ln(2)/t = r t, in hours is 1/3 ln(2)/(1/3) = r = 3 ln(2)
thats just the algebra
as you can see, the doubling has nothing to do with the initial size; it is only affected by time
or how fast, the rate ....
Find the rate of growth after 8 hours. How fast is the population growing after 8 hours; thats a rate of change question that says we take the derivative
Okay, see what you did. "t, in hours is 1/3 ln(2)/(1/3) = r = 3 ln(2)" the question D is asking for after 8 hours. So, i plug in 8 rather than 1/3 for t?
no, not that i am interpreting it. The initial equation for the growth tells us size for any given t in hours. teh rate at which that growth occurs is the dervative of the size
the size is: \[A(x) = 63e^{3ln(2)\ t}\] \[A'(x) = [3ln(2)\ t]'*63e^{3ln(2)\ t}\] \[A'(x) = 3ln(2)*63e^{3ln(2)\ t}\]
the rate of growth is then A'(x)
lol ... i used an x :) A(t) and A'(t)
if you plug in an 8 instead of the 1/3 your implying that this thing doubles every 8 hours which is false
Okay yeah, i got that. Look above at the second comment. I just wrote it differently. Instead of writing 3ln(2), i just had 2.0794415. So all I needed to do was find p'(t) from the beginning? God dammit!
yep
Thank you kind sir!
youre welcome, hope it helps ;)
Sigh, I'm having trouble taking the derivative.. Mind telling me where I'm screwing up in my steps? \[A(x)=63e^{3\ln(2) t}\] *product rule* \[A'(x)= [63 * e^{3\ln(2)t}] + [e^{3\ln(2)t} *0]\] So it comes back to the exact same thing? Since d/dx e^x = e^x???... But I know this can't be right?
Oh wait, did you do chain rule? How do you use chain rule with e^3ln(2)t? Did you just bring down the entire exponents and take the derivative of them? Weird...
you learnt the rule for "e" a little off. Every function pops out a chain rule. think of e^x as e^(f(x)) such the derivative of e^(f(x)) = e^(f(x))* f'(x)
derivatives always pop out an x'; but x' with respect to x = 1 so it tends to be discarded with no afterthought
d/dx [3ln(2)t = 3ln(2) according to your work above? But shouldn't it just be 3/2. Since d/dx ln(x) = 1/x
3ln(2) is a constant; there are no variables in it to operate upon. think of it as [Ct]' ; which is just C
d\dx ln(4) = 0 since ln(4) is just a constant. When something doesnt change, its rate of change is 0
if your always 5 years old, you never grow up :)
Silly mistake, i get it. TY
3ln(2) = 2.079 ...; the derivative of 2.079... is just 0
;)
Hmmm, I just plugging in 8 for t into A't = , got 2197896114, and I'm getting that that is wrong. The answer is in format: [answer box here] billion cells per hour. So do i divide by 8.. Don't know what to do.
2 197 896 114 that is about 2.2 billion
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!