need help with the attachment @MIT 18.01 Single …
the answer choices are a) F(8) - F(1) = 31 b) F(8) - F(1) = 35 c) F(8) - F(1) = 32 d) F(8) - F(1) = 33 e) F(8) - F(1) = 34
By definition of the function F, \[ F(b) - F(a) = \int_a^b f(x) \ dx \] So what does that imply for your problem?
Also, \[ F(8) - F(1) = (F(8) - F(2)) - (F(2) - F(1)) \] \[ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = 28 + \int_1^2 f(x) \ dx \]
However it doesn't have a function inside the integral
? I don't understand what you're saying.
the only thing they give us is f(X)
You have the graph of f(x) and \[ F(8) - F(2) = \int_2^8 f(x) \ dx = 28 \]
And you're asked to find the integral of f(x) from 1 to 8. So you already have the integral from x = 2 to 8. Now you need to add the part from x = 1 to 2.
ok
That is, \[ \int_1^8 f = \int_1^2 f + \int_2^8 f \]
You already know the second part of this. The only question then is what is the integral from 1 to 2, and you can figure that out from the graph.
And I'd rather not tell you what that is but ask you to figure it out.
From a more geometrical point of view, note that this is a piece-wise defined function where the leftmost function is clearly y=2x.\[\int_{2}^{4}2xdx=12,\]\[\int_{1}^{4}2xdx=15.\]
the part from 1 to 2 I counted 6 squares
Right, or even more geometrically, look at the area under the curve from 1 to 2 and figure out the area.
really? Count again.
4 square
no.
well there only two full complete squares between 1 and 2? Unless I'm suppose to count the area under the curve
Yes, what is the area under the graph of f(x) between 1 and 2.
If you can't figure it out geometrically, figure it out analytically, \[ \int_1^2 2x \ dx \]
3
yes
Therefore \[ F(8) - F(1) = .... what? \]
31
Yes, 28 + 3 = 31.
Now convince yourself geometrically that the area is 3.
ok, but how did you know how to figure it out analytically,
Because as across noted earlier, the function f(x) in that that range of x is f(x) = 2x
oh, ok thanks so much for helping me out James and across
Nobody mention the fundamental theorem of integral calculus ...
I didn't use those words, but in my first post, yes.
Okay James. btw I did found the area by looking it as a trapezium .. any other approach ?
aha using the equation of the straight line ..
Or as a rectangle and a triangle. Or as a rectangle and two segments of a square that you can put back together as one square.
Indeed .. cute little problem.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!