second-order linear ordinary differential equation y''-y = -2e^(-t) particulair solution yp = A*e^(-t) yp' = -A*e^(-t) yp'' = A*e^(-t) If i substitute it in the equation y''-y I get: A*e^(-t) - A*e^(-t) = -2*e^(-t) but the left side is zero?
\[y_P=Ate^{-t}\]
yeah but why?
wolfram says it.. but how can you calculate it
\[\mbox{because term }e^{-t}\mbox{ already exist in homogenic solution: }y_H=C_1e^t+C_2e^{-t}\]
\[r^2-1=0 => r=\pm 1\]
yeah i already got that one :)
y = c1e^x + c2e^-x
but the particulair one... drives me crazy
it should be multiplied by t to make the particular solution linearly independent
ok cool did you try \[y_p=Ae^{-t}+Bte^{-t}\] \[y_p'=-Ae^{-t}+Be^{-t}-Bte^{-t}\] \[y''_p=Ae^{-t}-Be^{-t}+Bte^{-t}-Be^{-t}\] so \[y''-y=e^{-t}(A-2B)+Bte^{-t}-[Ae^{-t}+Bte^{-t}]\] \[=e^{-t}(A-2B-A)+te^{-t}(B-B)=e^{-t}(-2B)\] this side is suppose to be equal to -2e^{-t} so -2B=-2 => B=1
but ... then yp = (At+b)*e^(-t)? or yp = t*e^(-t) and do i have to take the derivative of this to substitute it
and we didn't even need to plug in that homogeneous part i don't know why i did because that parts gonna turn out 0
the second one jessica
because remember be^{-t} is part of your homogenous solution
its gonna end up zeroing out
do you know what i mean?
okee... so yp will be (at+b)e^(-t)
just like what you did :) but a and b are vice versa
you can do that jessica but what i'm saying is you only need ate^{-t} since be^{-t} is part of your homogenous solution
ahhh oke.... thank you all for you explenations :)
have a good day jessica i think i will be leaving soon
yeaahh thank you :) i really appreciate your explanations :) i also wish you a good day :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!