For this question ( http://f.imgtmp.com/ghnor.jpg ), I'm trying to get either the gradient of both things or the tangent of both things and then dotting them together. My problem is that I when I try to find the gradient of the curve, I do not know how to get z = f(x,y) for it so that I can partial differentiate that for each component of the gradient. Similarly, if if I try to use tangents instead, I can't figure out how to get the surface with t variables such that I can find the tangent to it. If I am being unclear, just ask me to clarify even if you're not planning on helping out.
You can get a g(x,y,z) = 0 and derivate it to get the components of the gradient
for g(x,y,z) = 0, are you talking about the curve or the surface?
the surface
i already knew that as i explained in the first post (i probably didn't explain well though sorry). my problem is for the curve with the t variables. what do i do with the t variables? how do I make them x, y and z such that i can compute the gradient?
could you show me the steps? or tell me what to do step by step and i'll to the tedious algebra for you.
let me see my dropbox
alright. (does that have anything to do with me or you're just basically telling me to wait?)
take the derivative of the paramaterized curve w/respect to t and use one of the points to solve for t
one of the coordinates*
so you're doing it the tangents way?
let the curve be\[r(t)=<\frac23(t^3+2),2t^2,3t-2>\]the tangent will be given by the derivative\[r'(t)=<2t^2,4t,3>\]at the point we can use any coordinate to find t. Let's use the y-coordiante\[2t^2=2\to t=1\]so we have the direction of our curve at that point given by\[r'(1)=<2,4,3>\]
ok so r'(1) = <2,4,3> = tangent at point (2,2,1) foor the curve, right?
i likely am asking stupid stuff but i am trying to think in this sleep deprived state that i'm in
the gradient of the surface will be a vector perpendicular to that surface\[\nabla f=<2x,4y,6z>\]the vector at that point is\[\nabla f(2,2,1)=<4,8,6>\]if we take the dot product and compare it with the magnitudes we find that\[\nabla f(2,2,1)\cdot r'(1)=|\nabla f(2,2,1)||r'(1)|=58\]which means the angle between those vectors is zero, which proves what we wanted
yes to your question
how does the = 58 mean the angle is 0?
in the formula for the dot product:\[a\cdot b=|a||b|\cos\theta\]when the angle is 0 we have\[a\cdot b=|a||b|\cos0=|a||b|(1)=|a||b|\]so if the dot product of two vectors is the same as the product of their magnitudes, they are parallel
in this case we have\[\nabla f\cdot r'=|\nabla f||r'|\]\[<2,4,3>\cdot<4,8,6>=(\sqrt{2^2+4^2+3^2})(\sqrt{4^2+8^2+6^2})=58\]so that proves they are parallel
yes, i get it :D basically you looked for (dot product) = (just the mangnitude multiplications) because the question implied to look for it by asking you to prove it?
using the formula\[a\cdot b=|a||b|\cos\theta\]is a common way to find if vectors are parallel, perpendicular, or neither. I used it to prove that the tangent vector is parallel to and coincides with the gradient vector, which means it must be perpendicular to the surface.
so yes, basically
for (b), why are there to equations for the curve and one for the surface?
when two vectors are paralell we have\[a\cdot b=|a||b|\]and when they are perpendicular we have\[a\cdot b=0\]
Yes I was wondering the same about b... between that and the 'pint' typo I don't think I can help you with that part much
so it should be either x^2 - y^2 + z^2 = 1 OR xy + xz = 2 for the curve?
or maybe it's asking to verify for two curves and one surface?
I'm trying for the first curve but it's not looking right :/
maybe the second one is the intended one?
neither of the first two formulas are curves, they are both surfaces... perhaps the 'curve' is the intersection of those surfaces...?
that sounds like a very difficult problem, and I don't know if I want to undertake it without being sure that's what's requested the wording is clearly very strange :/
I think I have an idea...
I think they want to prove that each surface individually is tangent to the surface xyx-x^2-6y+6=0
so we need first to notice that all those surfaces share the point (1,1,1), so they at least intersect in some manner through that point to prove they are tangent we need to prove their gradients are parallel, which we would do with the same formula we just used
would you be willing to be my math slave in exchange for me making you a graphical program for whatever it is you want? :P
let g(x,y,z)=x^2 - y^2 + z^2 -1 and h(x,y,z)=xy + xz = 2 and f(x,y,z)= xyx-x^2-6y+6 we have to prove that\[\nabla g\cdot\nabla f=|\nabla g||\nabla f|\]and \[\nabla h\cdot\nabla f=|\nabla h||\nabla f|\]at the point in questoin and no thanks, teaching just helps me practice ;)
lol damn was just blowing off the cob webs from my basement's chains
would you be willing to do another 3 problems while i sleep? lol
I don't think the results would be up to par if I don't get my sleep
o ii didn't think your time zone was like mine
i would nevewr ask anyone to lack sleep lol
did you completely answer (b)?
well not the tedious algebra but the logic
no I'm still not getting a decisive answer, though my current interpretation is all I can come up with
I mean, I'm just not sure what the damn thing is asking
i'll look it over again tomorrow morning based on what you attempted. i don't want to keep you up for this. i will sleep and so should you. i appreciate your help very much.
I would be more persistent with it, but with the fuzzy wording I can't continue much you're welcome, good luck :D
thanks again :)
ttyl
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!