Question

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q2DpLVjAvGSjJCs6bme04Nlr6KmZqvS16bdRc

- what is your opinion from this please ?

Answer 1

I don't see anything...

Answer 2

my opinion is that sharing google docs is a waste of time if other people dont have a google account :)

Answer 3

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q2DpLVjAvGSjJCs6bme04Nlr6KmZqvS16bdRc1FpnSY/edit

- i think this is right

Answer 4

I am sure it's wrong.

Answer 5

You just showed some examples. There's no proof there.

Answer 6

... and what you can seeing on the last lines what can be deducting ,so not is right ?

Answer 7

You're saying in the last two lines that if you start at any number and apply the Collatz process, you will eventually reach \(10\) and that's not true.

Answer 8

By the way, it's not correct to write \(8/2=4/2=2/2=1\) because they are not equal. You can use an arrow or some other symbol.

Answer 9

so this is on this way because the Collantz's conjecture saying that in case of even numbers need divide by 2 and in case of odd numbers need multiplie by 3 and add 1 ... so than ?

Answer 10

I know, but = is not the right symbol for that because \(4\ne \frac{4}{2}=2\), for example.

Answer 11

ok but in this case what sign being correct ?

Answer 12

... so and how is possible seeing these last terms from 10/2 .... have resulted that are repetably for every numbers , yes ?