Two parallel plates, each having area A = 3490cm2 are connected to the terminals of a battery of voltage Vb = 6 V as shown. The plates are separated by a distance d = 0.36cm. You may assume (contrary to the drawing) that the separation between the plates is small compared with either linear dimension of the plate. A dielectric having dielectric constant κ = 3.6 is now inserted in between the plates of the capacitor as shown. The dielectric has area A = 3490 cm2 and thickness equal to half of the separation (= 0.18 cm) . What is the charge on the top plate of this capacitor?
[url= http://postimage.org/image/mkiih6lat/ ][img] http://s18.postimage.org/mkiih6lat/h8_plate_C.jpg [/img][/url]
C = Ea/(d/2) + kEa/(d/2) Q = CV = C X 6
E = epsilon naught
a = area of plate, d = 0.36 cm
k = dielectric constant
got it??
??
Sorry I was looking searchin google and didn't see you were answering.
So you basically treat it like a series?
in order to find the capacitance. Versus where you could have a dielectric filling like this..[url= http://postimage.org/image/pguu5cyl3/ ][img] http://s7.postimage.org/pguu5cyl3/showme.jpg [/img][/url]
and you treat that as parallel
yes..when the area of the plate is covered fully and the distance is covered partially its series
sweet! thanks
because
the current has only one path?
see..there is a graduating potential difference between the plates...if you cover the distance btween em partially u are effectively distributing the voltage btween the two regions..voltag is distributed in series isnt it?
understand?
ahh yes ..
and on the other hand.if you cover the area partially...the distace and hence the potential diff across both remains same..so you can see its parallel
Do you know of any links to pages that talks about this....just so I have it to go back too? My textbook explains it oddly and the way you explained made much more sense.
see....the book i have focuses on how to solve questions and tips and tricks..and i ad a godly teacher...you wont find the book...bt look fr ebooks by serway and jewett, or resnick and halliday if you can
resnick and halliday? I swear i have seen a physics by them. The teachers are my uni. are aggressive and not interactive with their teaching.
*prof
*at
wait..i might have found the book
dont worry..if you learn yourself its always better...discover the nuances yourself
thanks, trying to remain positive
dont worry...what year?
junior because I transferred in from a small school that didn't have much science. So I am really just flustered trying to shape up my mathematical thinking
also behind on my degree progress because of the transfer.
u know the hard path is always glorious dont you?
I am chem major but I want to make sure I have a good background in physics and math firs.t
haha yeah! One thing is for sure is that it truly is hard.
where do you study?
University of Vermont
in the states
aah...nice..
dnt worry...leave me a message whn you need help
thanks!. did you find what the name of that book is?
wait you can message people?
i know the name...i cant find the ebook
fundamentals of physics by resnick halliday and walker shld help you
okay.
if youre my fan..you can leave a fan testimonial
which acts like a message
ohh that thing. gotcha. H
are you doing circuit stuff right now?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!