We say the n × n matrix A is similar to the n × n matrix B if there is an invertible n × n matrix N so that B = N^(−1)AN. Another way to think about this is that B is simply the matrix A after the change of basis given by the column vectors of N. (a) Show that if A is similar to B, then B is similar to A. (i.e., if there is an invertible matrix N so that B = N^(−1)AN, which is what “A is similar to B” means, then there must also be some invertible matrix M so that A = M^(−1)BM, which is what “B is similar to A” means).
M=N^{-1}
I never would have thought of that lol...
why does that make sense? how did you figure that out? if you could ... thanks (:
\[B = N^{-1}AN\] \[NBN^{-1} =N N^{-1}ANN^{-1} \] \[NBN^{-1} =IAI=A \]
Functional inverses of the equations. DERP.
just to clarify Zarkon's already clear answer, calling N^(-1)=M is just a labeling trick, and doing his proof with that notation gives the exact result you want let M=N^(-1) then B=MAM^(-1) M^(-1)BM=M^(-1)MAM^(-1)M M^(-1)BM=IAI=A
Show that if A is similar to B, and B is similar to C, then A is similar to C. (i.e., if there is some invertible matrix N1 with B = N1^(−1) AN1, and some invertible matrix N2 with C = N2^(−1)BN2 then there is some invertible matrix N3 with A = N3^(−1)CN3 .) .... anyone?
Just taking a glance at it I think this proof can be done a similar way...
im just not sure how to work between 3 different bases.
\[B=N_1^{-1}AN_1\to N_1BN_1^{-1}=A\]\[C=N_2^{-1}BN_2\to N_2CN_2^{-1}=B\]sub expression for B from the second line into the first and let\[N_3=N_1N_2\iff N_3^{-1}=N_1^{-1}N_2^{-1}\]
sorry, rather let\[N_3^{-1}=N_1N_2\iff N_3=N_1^{-1}N_2^{-1}\]
ohhhh ok, thank you!!
welcome :D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!