Question

6y-1=27-y

Answer 1

Lorenzo, you have to give medals for people helping you. i answered 4 times and you havent given a single medal

Answer 2

y=4

Answer 3

7y=28
y=4

Answer 4

\[6y-1=27-y\]add y to both sides
\[7y-1=27\]add 1 to both sides
\[7y=28\]divide both sides by 7
\[y=4\]

Answer 5

Yeah. Well, no one is obligated to give a medal, but it's generally a good idea if it's correct and if it teaches you something. Just mentioning something again, Kim, coach them through it if you can but don't just give them the answer in the very first sentence of your very first post. Explain it.

Answer 6

Yeah, now THAT'S a good answer! :)

Answer 7

@Schrodinger just and FYI @UnkleRhaukus copy pastes answers from other sources like wolfram. Thats not a good answer. thats just plagiarizing

Answer 8

If I can ask, how do you know he straight up copypasted? I'm a little suspicious now. But regardless, try to explain your answers before just giving it.

Answer 9

I know because the layout of his answer is exactly like wolfram. I use it as a student so I know how the lay out appears. @Schrodinger

Answer 10

Have you ever used the equation bar? That's the exact same font, if that's what you're referring to by layout. It's a rather generic font, it doesn't mean he copy-pasted.

Answer 11

but the way its exaplained. Go to wolfram and type this equation. youl know what i mean

Answer 12

@UnkleRhaukus Hmm?

Answer 13

you think im lying? go to wolfram alpha, and type in this equation, then click on solve and see for yourself. @Schrodinger

Answer 14

That's not what I got precisely. I think you're making a heavyhanded and inaccurate accusation that is impossible to prove or disprove. Be careful what you say. :P

Answer 15

haha. Im proving it. Your not listening

Answer 16

hey! i do not copy past answers i type them in LATEX (not a font)

Answer 17

I just checked it in Wolfram. That's not the same. I'm listening in entirety.

Answer 18

You should go check it yourself, because that's not exactly what Wolfram said, and i'm pretty sure Rhaukus wrote it himself. Again, it's pretty heavy to accuse someone of plagarism, lol. That's rather presumptuous, too. Just be nice, man.

Answer 19

@kimdongwook Also, "you're" not listening, not "your". "Your" refers to a possessive, such as "your" dog, or "your" house. "You're" is a contraction of "You are." Like, for example, "You're happy", or "You're crazy!".

Answer 20

@Schrodinger you know? you may be right. Maybe he is extremely determined to answer the way he does and maybe he is simply to kind to provide answers in such fashions. I simply assumed such thing because its not in the norm for answers to appear that way.

Answer 21

hahaha, oh and in regards to my lil typo, Sorry! OOOPS

Answer 22

Yeah, no problem, someone else corrected me the other day about an answer I posted, and I felt bad. No worries. :)

Answer 23

Not even "the other day", lol, it was today. But yeah, no problem.