sorry for asking again, when should i use disc method and shell method when i need to find the volume by integration?
whenever you feel that one is easier than the other to perform
let say, the question is: Find the volume of the solid of revolution generated by revolving the region bounded by the curve y=xlnx, the x axis and the line x=1 and x=3 about the y-axis. what should i do?
draw a picture :)
\[\int_{1}^{3}2pi(xlnx)dx\] might be simplest
forgot an x in that ...
2pix * f(x)
or if es are better for you; convert it to es and play along
so you use shell method, but why?
becasue it works?
what would y=x lnx look like if you solve for x
y = ln x^x e^y = x^x realy isnt a simple function to play with
so the shel method would be your simplest route to take
so the curve y=xlnx revolved about y axis = use shell method?
it equals: use the easiest method. That method just so happens to be the shell, yes
a disc and a shell is really similar..
they are similar, except for the way the process looks at the function
the disc in this case looks at x(y) the shell in this case looks at y(x)
x(y) is pretyy hard to define when y(x) = xlnx
x(y) =?
dunno, since e^y = x^x we cant really get an explicit form for x(y)
What does x(y) mean?
the same thing any function notation means; x as a function of y
y(x) means y as a function of x r(t) means r as a function of t etc .....
x(y) in this case would need to be the inverse of y(x)
so if it can be easily expressed in terms of y, disc method can also be used?
yes, if it could be easily expresed in terms of y, then disc would be fine to use
the method doesnt change the value
which is more; 5 gallons of water in a blue vase; or 5 gallons of water in a purple vase?
blue vase? purple case?
express the equation into an easier form to integrate when y is expressed in terms of x, and it is revolved about y axis, shell method is used when x is expressed in terms of y, and it is revolved about y axis, disc method is used can i conclude in this way?
in general, no
the disc method is blocked by this problem simply becasue there is no way to define x(y) in a usable maner to play with the disc method
the only option we have is to use the shell method
then how would you determine which is the eaiser way?
easier
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=inverse+y%3Dx*lnx that W function they use aint something that can be integrated with the stuff we are taught
i think i understand it a little, thanks :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!