Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (turingtest):

Integral\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}x\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

0

OpenStudy (turingtest):

incorrect

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This integral does not converge

OpenStudy (anonymous):

indeterminate?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

int dx/x = lnx ln( inf) - ln (-inf) inf - inf...l'hospital!!!

OpenStudy (turingtest):

correct, but why is it not zero? can we make it zero?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ln(-infinity) isn't defined

OpenStudy (turingtest):

yes, but that's not the main problem

OpenStudy (turingtest):

that can't be fixed there is a way to fix this integral to make it give zero, as it intuitively should

OpenStudy (turingtest):

perhaps "fix" is the wrong word but there is something that can be done to get the logical answer of 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

why isn't this zero? the integral is area under the curve of (1/x) from -infty to infty, it must be zero?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

but we have a singularity at x=0

OpenStudy (zarkon):

it is not...the integral does not converge for several reasons

OpenStudy (turingtest):

Yes Zarkon, you taught me about this, I'm trying to see how others take it

OpenStudy (zarkon):

ic

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what about the logical, intuitive way you were talking about? it was a trap?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

the 'intuition' I would have (before Zarkon enlightened me) is that because 1/x is odd, this is zero but the singularity, amongst other reasons, prevents this trick

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay, this might be a little stupid or a lot stupid to ask but why is \[\int _{\infty} ^{\infty} \frac1x = 0\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

\[\int_{-a}^{a}f(x)dx=0\]if f(x) is odd, so one may come to the conclusion that\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}x=0\]as I did in an earlier problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think this must be the case if f(x) is even, maybe \[\int_{-a}^{a} f'(x) dx = [f(x)]_{-a}^{a} = f(a) - f(-a)= 0\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i shouldn't have answered zero as the answer, something is wrong with my head... now when i think zero doesn't even make sense

OpenStudy (turingtest):

\[\int_{-a}^{a}f(x)dx=2\int_{0}^{a}f(x)dx\]if f(x) is even

OpenStudy (turingtest):

and yeah, I realized that zero makes no sense too after a couple minutes as well hence I find this whole dilemma interesting

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yeah, thanks...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

do you want me to tell you how physicists get away with saying that this integral is 0 ? or do you want to investigate it yourself?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i don't have a clue how physicists do it, it'd be better you tell me

OpenStudy (turingtest):

as Zarkon said, the integral really doesn't converge (I'm going to say just because of the singularity at x=0) so there is a trick to avoid this called the Cauchy principle value (CPV) that sort of circumvents the point x=0 evenly in both directions from x=0 i.e. they split the integral and make what would be the middle term x=0 into x=-a and x=a respectively http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_principal_value

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I think this is a really good thing to know about improper integrals, and I just learned about it, so I wanted to bring it up here :)

OpenStudy (turingtest):

physicists sometimes use the CPV without stating it, so that is why I mentioned them

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks, really nice of you to do so... i think some threads on openstudy must be made resource threads or wiki threads maybe (like this one)

OpenStudy (turingtest):

lol, well it's got the wiki link on it! but thanks, fun discussion :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!