Solve for x . (a^2-1)x^2+2(a-1)x+1=0
you know you could just use the quadratic formula... but I suppose you want a smarter way?
Smarter way would be perfect.
completing the square is pretty easy as well. pick your poison... I personally, dont know--and have never used the quadratic formula :)
oh I do \(not\) believe that agreene!
but yeah, completing the square sounds a little less painful
And how is it done?
I think my algebra II teacher in gradeschool tried to teach me the quadratic, but i already knew completing the square, and it--unlike the quadratic--can be used in all cases, and all polynomials.
the quadratic formula can be used in all cases
divide by a^2-1 \[\frac{2(a-1)x}{a^2-1}+\frac{1}{a^2-1}+x^2=0\] subtract 1/(a^2-1) \[\frac{2(a-1)x}{a^2-1}+x^2=-\frac{1}{a^2-1}\] add (a-1)^2/(a^2-1)^2 to both sides \[\frac{2(a-1)x}{a^2-1}+\frac{(a-1)^2}{(a^2-1)^2}+x^2=\frac{(a-1)^2}{(a^2-1)^2}-\frac{1}{a^2-1}\] factor \[(\frac{a-1}{a^2-1}+x)^2=-\frac{2}{(a-1)(a+1)^2}\] sqrt both sides \[|\frac{a-1}{a^2-1}+x|=-\frac{i\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{a-1}(a+1)}\] from there--break the abs and do some simplifications you will find: \[x=\frac{\pm i\sqrt{2}-\sqrt{a-1}}{\sqrt{a-1}(a+1)}\]
and, @TuringTest I thought there were a few cases where it was indeterminate...
What about this. Find the values of a so that the equation (a^2-1)x^2+2(a-1)x+1>0
@agreene I'd like to see one the formula is\[ax^2+bx+c=0\implies x={-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}\over2a}\]so unless a=0 this is defined if b^2-4ac<0 you get a complex answer, which is still defined
(and if a=0 it's not a quadratic obviously)
yeah, it seems like it would work for all quadratics. I seem to remember someone telling me there were large limitations on it (aside from it only working on quadratics)
I think they misrepresented the situation the QF always works, but it is sort of a default option in my opinion, as it leads to messy algebra at times like these
yeah, completing the square has the drawback of needing to find sometimes odd algebra to force the factorization... QF looks like it could just be a derived version of CTS
it sure can, as one may expect in mathematics they are really different faces of the same thing
yeah, if u solve ax^2+bx+c=0 with respect to x, using completing the square... the answer is the quadratic... great... now i know the quadratic and how to get it :( I DIDNT WANT TO KNOW THAT TURING!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!