Hi--I am having a problem on laplace transforms. I have a stepfunction graph (attached), but I don't know how translate it into a formula that I can solve for.
Sorry guys for the wait.
I know one eqn: u(t) = u(t-c), but I don't know how to use it properly for this situation.
I'm sorry. Don't think I know. :(
Thanks okay. Thanks for looking at my question though :)
f only goes to 2 between x=2 and x=5, and for all other values the function is zero to turn the "switch" on at 2 we have\[2u_2(t)\]to turn it off we have\[-2u_5(t)\]so\[2u_2(t)-2u_5(t);0\le t\le8\]seems to be your graph you want the laplace of that...
When you say "switch" what do you mean? Between open and closed?
I mean that step functions act like switches: when x reaches a certain value, addig a step function can turn a function on\[u_c(t)f(t)\]has the effect of "turning on" the function f(t) at x=c, because that is when the value of \(u(t)\) changes from 0 to 1
when t reaches a certain....*
oh, okay. I think that you have the u_5 (t) as another equation? I know that it represents something, but I don't know how to calculated it so that it can be evaluated from 0 to 8
right now I have 2u_2/s^2 and 2u_5/s^2, which I was going to evaluate from 0 to 8, but that doesn't make sense
we need to turn the "switch" off at t=5, right? so we can do that by "turning on" the inverse operation (subtraction here) at t=5 with another step function\[u_3(t)f(x)-u_5(t)f(x)\]think about what happens here at t=3: f(x) turns on think about what happens then at t=5: -f(x) turns on, which effectively cancels f(x) i.e. it turns f(x) off
Where does the t = 3 come from?
so we can even write this as\[f(x)[u_3(t)-u_5(t)]\]inside the brackets we have 1 between t=3 and t=5 for all other values we have zero hence, f(x) works only on that range now about ending at t=8....
I got disconnected! I still don't know where t comes from, I am sorry
I have t =2...
Sorry, Open study froze for 5 mins for some reason on my end
mine too, they're having problems
I am doing this now---in my integral, is the lower bound 2 b/c u_2_(t)?
what integral?
I though you were doing laplace?
Your welcome! Good to know its not just my computer! :)
\[ \int\limits_{2}^{infinity}\]
Right---I am doing laplace, but I have to the integral of e^(-st)*u_2_(t) dt right?
but that is the hard way do you \(have\) to do it that way?
and then subtract that from whatever the one were u_5_(t) dt?
...using the definition of the Laplace transform?
I don't have too, but I don't know how to do this at all, so I was trying to follow my book but its not clear
I don't know the derivation for the laplace of a step function but I do have a formula!
I think the formula you are talking about is e^(-as)/s ?
so it would be e^(-2s)/s ? something like this?
yes, but with the 2 still there
oh, so the 2 stays out front--and it's two because that's when the switch happens on the u(t) axis or something?
no that's a coincidence the function in this case f(x)=2 in the formula I gave above
\[(2*e^(-2s))/s - (2*e^(-5s))/s\]
\[\frac2s(e^{-2x}-e^{-5s})\]yeah
...is that x supposed to be a s? :)
yep
Okay. And I understand your explanation about the 2 now, looking back at this graph
and now I just take the laplace of that. Thanks for helping me!
wait... I can't because it is in s, not t....
so that eqn IS the laplace transform?
yes :)
Thanks! You have been a big help. I really need to study this chapter for Laplace. Oh, and the website is reloading soon, so hopefully we won't have any more freezes!
here's a ref: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/LaplaceIntro.aspx good luck !
Thanks!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!