Is pi in base e is transcendental or algebraic?
Or do we not know?
I propose that \(\pi\) is transcendental. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_number#Numbers_proven_to_be_transcendental We can see that if \(\ln(a)\) is transcendental if, for some \(a\), \(a\) is algebraic.
Nevermind. I thought I had it. :(
D:
Try this on for size. Let\[a=e^{i \pi} +1 + e^b \qquad \qquad b\in\mathbb{N}, \;\;\;b \neq 1\]Now, \[\ln(a) = \ln(e^{i \pi} +1+e^b)=\ln(e^b)=b\]Since we're in \(\mathbb{Q}(e)\) \(b\) must be algebraic. Using the property I linked to, we know that if b is algebraic, this implies that either \(b=0, 1\) or \(\ln(a)\) is algebraic. However, \(b\neq 0, 1\) so \(\ln(a)=b\) is algebraic. And we've gone in a circle! Thank you and good night. I shall inquire about this question to my professor tomorrow.
This could however be used as a proof that all rational numbers are algebraic in this field we're working with.
Wait what? You're saying that pi is rational?
I'm confuzzled.
number is coled transcendental if it's not a solution of algebraic equation like a polinomial
\[e ^{\pi} \] is transcendental
but, I don't see what it has to do with pi in base e...
you mean base e logarithm?
No, base e as in base 2 (binary) base 10 (decimal)
Oo
no idea
pi in base e= 10(base e) +pi-e in base e pi-e in base e is the same as pi in binary?
*pi-e in binary
To end your confuzzlement @inkyvoyd , I proved nothing. I showed that if a number \(b\) is algebraic, then it follows that it's algebraic.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!