Hi everyone: I am not sure about the following thing I did. Let J be a countable finite set, and f0jk and f1jk be two continuous functions defined on [0,1]. Consider the following statement: ∀lj∈J,∀x∈[0,1],f0jk(x)≤f1jk(x) Negating the above statement gives me: ∃lj∈J,∃xˆ∈[0,1],f0jk(xˆ)>f1jk(xˆ) Question 1: Am I correct in the way I negate the original statement? Question 2 (and perhaps the most important): The fact that the negation involves only one member gives the freedom to assume that every other element satisfies the properties in the original statement?
yes, you negate for all... for all ... with there exists... there exists... not whatever
and so yes, all you have to do is come up with one that violates the condition
thanks a lot!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!