Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hi everyone: I am not sure about the following thing I did. Let J be a countable finite set, and f0jk and f1jk be two continuous functions defined on [0,1]. Consider the following statement: ∀lj∈J,∀x∈[0,1],f0jk(x)≤f1jk(x) Negating the above statement gives me: ∃lj∈J,∃xˆ∈[0,1],f0jk(xˆ)>f1jk(xˆ) Question 1: Am I correct in the way I negate the original statement? Question 2 (and perhaps the most important): The fact that the negation involves only one member gives the freedom to assume that every other element satisfies the properties in the original statement?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, you negate for all... for all ... with there exists... there exists... not whatever

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and so yes, all you have to do is come up with one that violates the condition

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks a lot!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!