Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

About proofs.. Given: Quadrilateral ABCD, line segment AD is congruent to line segment BC and angle DAE is congruent to angle BCE Prove: Triangle AEF is congruent to triangle CEG Someone please help me out with statements and reasons, totally lost. (:

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Ok. First we draw a picture.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have the picture, it was given. This is from a regents review.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Well, you should provide the picture, because E comes out of nowhere.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Give me a minute, I'll upload one.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Picture

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

ABCD is a parallelogram because of the alternate interior angles

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

in a parallelogram, diagonals bisect each other.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

due to ASA congruence thesetwo triangles are congruent.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im confused.. are those my statements or reasons along with? I'm a hopeless case when it comes to proofs..sorry to frustrate you..

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

in triangles AEF and CEG Angle DAE = Angle BCE ( given) AE = EC (given) Angle FEA = Angle GEC ( vertically opposite) therefore triangles AEF and CEG are congruent by A A S test The FE = EG corresponding sides in congruent triangles

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

*ASA

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

@campbell_st , that's not correct...

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

in triangles AEF and CEG Angle DAE = Angle BCE ( given) AE = EC Angle FEA = Angle GEC ( vertically opposite) therefore triangles AEF and CEG are congruent by A S A test The FE = EG corresponding sides in congruent triangles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

My teacher mentioned that you use Alternate Interior Angles to prove parallel lines...

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

AE=EC is because ABCD is a parallelogram

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

ABCD is a parallelogram because of the angles given.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

(one pair of congruent and parallel sides makes a parallelogram)

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

you're not asking to prove parallel lines you're asked to prove congruency and with the proves ASA and AAS are the same proves... its showing 2 angles ( and subsequently the 3rd) and a side in 1 triangle are congruent to another.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Uhm, no.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I understand what I'm trying to prove and need to end up using a triangle congruence theorem, but to get to that, apparently I did it wrong the first time.

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

you can say AD and BC are parallel bot there is no information about AB and CD to say they are parallel.... the quadrilateral could be a trapezium...

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

AE = EC (given) is wrong.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

That's not given dude.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

That's proved

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

by showing quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram, and that a parallelogram's diagonals bisect each other.

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

if you use my solution us have don it correctly... its just that it doesn't agree with you're teacher's solution.... perhaps because he wanted a specific method rather then the more lateral solution of proving congruency... by any method

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

you can say AD and BC are parallel bot there is no information about AB and CD to say they are parallel.... the quadrilateral could be a trapezium... COmpletely wrong One pair of parallel and congruent sides detemnes a parallelogram.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallelogram#Characterizations

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Read wikipedia before you say that it isn't a parallelogram.

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

well good luck

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

And, @campbell_st , your proof is completely wrong.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

inkyvoyd- i'm agreeing with your explanations only because it sounds as how my teacher would've put it. Now I ask of you if you could easily write out the statements and reason in a charted way such as Statements | Reasons ______________________________________ 1. Quadrilateral ABCD ... etc | 1. Given

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

AD is congruent to line segment BC It says absolutely nothing about AE and EC

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Alright, I'm going to just prove that AE is congruent to EC, because that's all that we are missing.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

1. AD is parallel to BC (Converse of the alternate interior angles theorem) 2. angle DAE is congruent to angle BCE (Given) 3. Quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram (One set of congruent and parallel sides determines a parallelogram) #This is usually assumed as "common knowledge" in geometry, so you don't have to prove it, unless specifically requested. 4. DB bisects AC (Properties of a parallelogram) 5. AE is congruent to EC (definition of bisection)

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

@deckedinchrome , there you go, I am so NOT typing that again, waht a pain lol

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

here is the proof Angle DAE = Angle BCA ( given) therefore AD is parallel to CB prove congrency in triangles ADE and BCE Angle DAE = Angle BCE (given) DA = CB (given) Angle ADE = Angle CBE ( interior alt angles AD//CB) Triangles are congruent by ASA test then AE = CE corresponding angles in congruent triangles so in Triangles FEA and CEG angle FAE = angle CGE (given) Angle FEA = angle CEG ( vertically opposite) AE = CE (proved above) therefore triangles ADE and BCE are congruent by ASA test..,. QED

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Well, that works too 0.o

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

oops AE = EC corresponding sides in congruent triangles

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Techinically we just did the same proof...

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

You just proved that ABCD is a parallelogram, while I assumed that it was..

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

i.e. your answer is better than mine, but mine would get full credit as well.

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

the question says prove.... not assume...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What do you mean by "converse of the alternate interior theorem"?

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

No.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

It is common knowledge that parallelograms are determined by one pair of parallel congruent sides

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Don't tell me it isn't, I learned that in both America and Taiwan, a total of three times. I also self studied it.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

And, converse means

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

if a, then b converse: if b, then a

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Converses are not always true, but for the alternate interior angle theorem, the converse is valid as well as the original statement.

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

it shows AD and CB are parallel... thats all.... but good luck with your geomerty

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

No, AD and CB are congruent.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Congruent+parallel means it is a parallelogram.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Did you even read wikipedia dude?-.-

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

*congruen and parallel

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

lol.... well whatever you believe.... its proven.... simple as that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Guys. quit blowing up my question with your arguments. Also, Wikipedia is an unreliable source that can be edited by anyone. Also: for #4 in the proof from inkyvoyd, explain properties of a parallelogram

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Wikipedia is a reliable source when you check the citations.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

That particular block just happens to have 2 (yes -.-) citations.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

@Hero , please explain what I'm trying to say, as well as help decked here out, before I rage quit.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

(my proof, not wikipedia's credibility lool)

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

And @deckedinchrome , that part is also common knowledge. Go read wikipedia for proof,

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallelogram#Proof that diagonals bisect each other

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

this stuff all depends on you motivation... I find it easier to have good basics that can be applied to any question than relying on a memory full of facts i may or may not use

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Well, I find it good to have both.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Asian math has trained me to be able to rely on memory, because the problems that we get can get much much harder

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Alright. Nevermind. You're frustrated as me because I'm clearly a dumb blonde in geometry. Your reasons are too logical and your knowledge base is clearly that of much higher than mine. I just bullpelletted my way through the proof, and we'll see how it goes. Thanks for the help.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

hard to the point that it might be 7 or 8 steps of "basic" knowledge. if you use memorization, it becomes maybe 3 or 4 steps. STill hard, but much faster.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

@deckedinchrome , campbell provided a valid proof as well.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

I just don't like him lool

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

lol... good luck to you... and close the question

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Not yet.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Hero is going to help you out.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

At least, I hope he will.

hero (hero):

If you're studying for Geometry Regents exams, here's a resource that might help. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAA216E5D8E78F8FD&feature=plcp

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

(I assume that decked has been thoroughly trolled)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!