Helppppppp..............................................................A group of scientists believe that global warming is an irreversible process. Another group of scientists feel that human intervention can reverse the global warming process. Which of these is the most likely outcome of differences in opinions of scientists on the issue of global warming?

All old ideas would be discarded.

Scientific evidence would be weakened.

New ideas would be created and tested.

The limitations of science would be evident.

Question

Helppppppp..............................................................A group of scientists believe that global warming is an irreversible process. Another group of scientists feel that human intervention can reverse the global warming process. Which of these is the most likely outcome of differences in opinions of scientists on the issue of global warming?

 All old ideas would be discarded.

 Scientific evidence would be weakened.

 New ideas would be created and tested.

 The limitations of science would be evident.

blues · Answer

You should use process of elimination for this and problems like it. Do any of them strike you as being things it probably isn't? Or, for that matter, do any of them strike you as being things it probably is?

lanre · Answer

Consider this: A) cannot be the most likely outcome because all old ideas cannot be discarded as there might be element of information in them and they have not been proven to be wrong. B) cannot be the most likely outcome because scientific evidence cannot be weakened instead they are needed to prove either of the opinions. C) should be the most likely outcome because the argument will lead to the formulation of new ideas ( hypothesis), which will be tested. D) cannot be the most likely outcome because there is no limitation is science.