can anyone derive time dilation without using lorentz transformation? (if yes, please tell me)
Yes, you can. The only thing you have to say, is that celerity of light is independent of frame. You have to consider light bouncing on a mirror from two different frames, one in which the mirror is stationary, the other where it is moving. I will not type the derivation here, as it can be found in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Simple_inference_of_time_dilation_due_to_relative_velocity
Lot of Thanks for it. But a professor of IUCAA showed a derivation using completely different methode which I have not found anywhere. And I have remembered that he used: \[(\Delta s)^2=c^2(\Delta t)^2-(\Delta x)^2\] and I have also remembered that he used Taylor series expantion
This method is invariance of the magnitude of the space-time 4-vector.
can you tell me the detail
Take a light clock, with two facing mirrors a distance d apart, and put it on a spaceship moving at a high speed. Photon, which moves at a constant speed independent of one's frame of reference, takes time d = ct => t = d/c to go from one mirror to the next. Person watching spaceship go by at speed v sees photon moving diagonally, so that it must move r^2 = (vt)^2 + d^2, where time t is time it takes photon to move r = ct. Replace r with ct => (ct)^2 = (vt)^2 + d^2 => t^2(c^2 - v^2) = d^2 => t = sqrt(d^2 / (c^2 - v^2))
So, if v = c, we divide by zero => time dilation approaches infinity. (timeless)
I don't know if that's what you were asking for, or if it's even correct... but it was based on the simple observation that photons move at a constant speed regardless of one's frame of reference and some basic trig.
@queelius is right from\[t=\sqrt{d^2\over c^2-v^2}\]we can rewrite this as\[t={\frac dc\over\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\] call \(\frac dc=t_r\) the rest time that it takes for the light to move from one mirror to the next and we get relative to an observer on the ship and we get\[t={t_r\over\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\] which is the formula for time dilation as it is usually written.
That's exactly true, I know about this. But I want to know another process which is theoretical and Lorentz transformation has not been used there
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!