Find the work done in moving an object along a vector r = 3i + 2j - 5k if applied force is F = 2I - J - K
\[W=\int\vec F\cdot d\vec s\]so it's just the integral of the dot product
\[W=\int\vec F\cdot d\vec r\]
but there are no bounds on your integral, so perhaps they just want the dot product...?
yeah... the question does not have bounds it is just plane like that
maybe you should post this in the physics group (though I usually would help you in that dept. too) I'm just not sure about the meaning of the question since there is no actual path, just a direction
ohkay i will do that now
I'm starting to think they just want the dot product
because r has a length, so it can be interpreted as a line segment so just do\[W=\vec F\cdot\vec r\]
...at least that's what I think
ohkay... because the 1st equation you gave out is for the conservative force field
?
the first equation I gave is for the work done by a force function acting on a parametric displacement function
the force does not need to be conservative for that equation to hold
it's actually a line integral\[W=\int\limits_C\vec F\cdot d\vec s\]so it doesn't have to be conservative
if\[\oint\vec F\cdot d\vec s=0\]then \(\vec F\) is conservative
yes i agree
but like I say, I don't even think your question wants you to do an integral... as far as I can see
yep cause it does not have bounds
\[|\overrightarrow F|=\sqrt{(2)^2+(-1)^2+(-1)^2}=\sqrt{6}.\]\[|\overrightarrow r|=\sqrt{(3)^2+(2)^2+(-5)^2}=\sqrt{38}.\]\[W=F*r*\cos \theta\]But I don't know what is theta?
so where will i get the angle from
I think Dot product of vector will come into application. Only i think.
you can just do it with the dot product method
\[\vec v=\langle a,b,c\rangle\]\[\vec u=\langle x,y,z\rangle\]\[\vec u\cdot\vec v=ax+by+cz\]
that is the definition of the euclidean inner product in \(\mathbb R^3\)
ohk i will try with the dot product
another definition*
@TuringTest I wanna ask a question. Plz help:)
I can try, but please post separately I will help if I know how of course :)
which is true? 1.) \[W=\overrightarrow F* \overrightarrow S* \cos \theta\] 2.) \[W=F*S* \cos \theta.\]
not sure what the second means exactly, but if F and S are magnitudes then 2) is true
@TuringTest must derivate the vector r ?
no, it is a line integral
...normally I mean
the formula is force times distance equals work basically
since r is a distance no derivative required
so i use the normak r given out ?
Isn't it like this "Work is dot product of force & displacement"? \[W=\overrightarrow F . \overrightarrow S\]\[\implies W= |\overrightarrow F| \times |\overrightarrow S| \times \cos \theta= F*S* \cos \theta\] ???????????????????/
@TuringTest Plz:)
if it is a straight line, yes but if the path curves you have to parameterize it in terms of time and that method will not work\[\vec u\cdot\vec v=\|\vec u\|\|\vec v\|\cos\theta_{uv}\]
w = f . r =9 am i right?
that's the formal definition statement^
oh i see? @kay-jay what value did u take as theta?
theta?
@kay-jay I get 9 as well
you do not need theta @maheshmeghwal9 there are two ways to define our dot product
am not using the dot product that needs an angle
the formula\[\vec v\cdot\vec u=\|\vec v\|\|\vec u\|\cos\theta\] is more limited than the formula I prescribed above; it only works when the vectors are constant and do not change with time in this case we could use this formula as well, but I forget how to find the angle... gotta look at my notes
@TuringTest so you think our answer might be true ?
Oh i see what did u both do? That was an extraordinary shot^ Thanx for nice solution @Turingtest :)
It must be true:)
our answer is true if I have interpreted the problem correctly I am saying that the problem states that the given force F is acting along a vector r, and that the magnitude of vector r represents distance that it travels if I am right about that interpretation I think that we have the right answer
yeah Answer depends on Interpretation.
PS: the only way I know to find the angle between them is to use the other formula for the dot product\[\vec u\cdot\vec v=ax+by+cz\]so it would be redundant to try to find the angle
am writing on monday at 14h00 so i want to represent this group with good marks. @TuringTest you are really helping... thank you and thank you also @maheshmeghwal9
yw:D Best of luck for ur representation^_^ @kay-jay
you could say\[\vec u\cdot\vec v=\|\vec u\|\|\vec v\|\cos\theta\implies\theta=\cos^{-1}{\vec u\cdot\vec v\over\|\vec u\|\|\vec v\|}\]but see how you still have to use\[\vec u\cdot\vec v=ax+by+cz\]to find the angle so like I say, that method is redundant at best
@TuringTest the one you mension now is for three dimensional
yes
Wow seems more interesting:D
mathematics is interesting but challenging
^_^
I think one attribute contributes to the other :)
yeah i think too:D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!