Unscramble the proof so that the statements on the left match up to the justifications on the right. It also needs to be in the correct order.
Really need help with this, please!
There area couple parts that are fairly easy. Can you tell me what the very first statement and reason is?
a). Angles 2 and 5 are supplementary - Given.
Perfect. Next up, we need to find a statement that logically follows from "Angles 2 and 5 are supplementary." Do you have any guesses to this?
<2 + <5 = 180 ?
Right again. The reasoning for this, is merely the definition of supplementary angles. Now it get's a little bit trickier. Any guesses for the third statement?
<2 = <3 - Vertical Angle Theorem ?
Right again! So we have half of the statements and reasons in the correct order. We just have a couple more to go. For the fourth statement, we know <2+<5=180, and <2=<3 What should be the next statement?
Either <3 + <5 = 180 or Angle 3 and angle 5 are supplementary.
It certainly must be one of those two. In fact, it should be that "<3 + <5 = 180." Can you give the reasoning?
Using my vast deduction skills (jokes), I'd say it would be Definition of Supplementary Angles.
Close. I would argue for "substitution." Note that since you have the two facts "<2+<5=180," and "<2=<3" it's merely a substitution to get "<3 + <5 = 180." Now, I'm sure you can tell me the next reason.
Angle 3 and angle 5 are supplementary - Definition of Supplementary Angles line l || line m - Converse of Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem
Perfect!
Thanks so much @KingGeorge! You're the best :D
You're welcome.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!