Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table. Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not? ~(p ∧ q) and (p ∨ ~q)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

May someone help me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i dont know where part is missing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

second to the bottom

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i see F T F F T F F ~(p ∧ q) and (p ∨ ~q) 1. ~(true) and (true) = false and true not equivalent 2. ~(false) and (true)= true and true equivalent 3. ~(FALSE) and (false) = true and false not equivalent 4. ~(false) and (true) = true and true equivalent

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks! But could you help me understand it, a bit more?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for p and q we already have TT TF and FF , that's why we just combination of FT so p = F and q= T

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we just need*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

after we got p = F and q = T then of course ~q = F got it ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok. THANKS!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

next p ^ q = F ^ T = ? remember ^ means 'and' and v means 'or'

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!