Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table. Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not? ~(p ∧ q) and (p ∨ ~q)
May someone help me?
i dont know where part is missing
second to the bottom
oh i see F T F F T F F ~(p ∧ q) and (p ∨ ~q) 1. ~(true) and (true) = false and true not equivalent 2. ~(false) and (true)= true and true equivalent 3. ~(FALSE) and (false) = true and false not equivalent 4. ~(false) and (true) = true and true equivalent
Thanks! But could you help me understand it, a bit more?
for p and q we already have TT TF and FF , that's why we just combination of FT so p = F and q= T
we just need*
after we got p = F and q = T then of course ~q = F got it ?
ok. THANKS!
next p ^ q = F ^ T = ? remember ^ means 'and' and v means 'or'
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!