math question inside
is it that long
I just need someone to check this if right...and if wrong...please explain p: You get an A on the final exam q: You do every exercises in the book r: You get an A in this class Write these propositions using p, q and r and logical connectives a) You get an A in this class but you don;t do every exercise in the book => \(r \wedge \neg q\) b) You get an A on final, you do every exercise in the book and you get an A in this class => \(p \wedge q \wedge r\) c)To get an A in this class, it is necessary for you to get an A in the final \(r \leftrightarrow p\) d) You get an A on the final, but you don't do every exercise in the book; nevertheless, you get an A on this class => \(p \wedge \neg q \wedge r\) e) Getting an A on the final and doing every exercise in the book is sufficient for getting an A in this class => \((p \wedge q) \rightarrow r\) f) You will get an A in this class if and only if you either do every exercise in the book or get an A in the final => \(r \leftrightarrow (q \vee p)\)
and yes @Jonask it was very long
i typed the whole question along with the latex so it took time
i would like questions like this where do you find them
i think b) is (p and q)implies r
why so? it just used "and"
and it's actually an e-book.. the title is Discrete Mathematics and its application 6th edition
sorry thats e) are you looking for solutions or smeting
my e) is (p and q) implies r
so does that mean i have no mistakes?
i am using the one by kenneth e rosen is that the1
this book is kenneth h. rosen...they could be different...
srry yes h
so do i have any mistakes?
i dont see ANY,I ALSO NEED SOME PRACTICE I JUST STARTED
hmm yeah..not much are good in these things... maybe @NewbieCarrot can give a second opinion
c) Should not be a bi-conditional. It is not saying that if you get an A on the final you then you will get an A in the class; however, it is saying that if you get an A in the class, then you did get an A on the final.
doesn't "it is necessary" mean that if and only if?
Nope.
"it is necessary and sufficient" means if and only if.
so it is necessary just means conditional?
Think about it. If I said "For rain, it is necessary to have clouds" then?
Does it mean that clouds imply rain?
hmmm....well my third choice that makes sense would be conjunction
It's not a bi-conditional.
It is a conditional, but just not two way.
so how do you write it out
\(r\rightarrow p\)
can i say then not p implies not r
no clouds no rain
Yeah, that is the contrapositive.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!