Complete the 2 column proff! I REALLY NEED HELP! i dont get this at all
|dw:1350364614424:dw|
Do you know why angle 2 = angle 4?
no? i dont ge this at all
It looks like the proof is complete... what's missing, the justifications?
i dont get a well a is given b d c
all i have to do is tell if it is prove or given for b&d&c idk how i do that
Alright, well, let's first investigate why <2 = <4. Those are alternate exterior angles of a transversal through two lines. If they are equal, then that means the transversed lines are parallel.
<4 = 110º because it is given that <4 = <2, and <2 is given as 110º I hope that much at least makes sense to you.
no lol sorry
would b : be given?
b isn't given
so it is prove?
b is the transitive property
(b) is practically given since it follows directly from the given information, but you have to use an axiom to justify it.
but i think d is given and c is prove also
Nothing is given except what it says is given, and that is completely contained in the first line.
"prove" is not a justification. You have to supply the reason why the statement is true.
prove is what we're trying to prove. it's going to be our last statement, and it will still have to have a justification
@hottiela , do you at least see why <3 +<4 = 180º?
|dw:1350365754716:dw|
why would m<4 + m<3 = 180? what makes that true?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!