I dont get this... all comes ahead... its all in the context of evaluating improper integrals in complex analysis..
\[\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}sint dt=\lim_{r \rightarrow \infty}\int\limits_{-r}^{r}sint dt =\lim_{r \rightarrow \infty}[-cost]=\lim_{r \rightarrow \infty}0=0\] note; the value of [−cost] is between r and -r. so my question is how have they got that the limit of -cost is 0?
we dont even know the values of r and -r...so how did htey find that -cost has limit 0?
I'm taking this at face-value, for now, but what if we forget about the limit for the moment, and focus on the integral \[\huge \int\limits_{-r}^{r}\sin \ t \ dt\]instead?
use the fact that cos(-x) = cos(x) ... this integral shouldn't converge (i think). what you are calculating is Cauchy Principal Value.
\[\large = \left[-\cos \ t \right]_{-r}^{r}=(-\cos \ r)-(-\cos(-r))=0\]
Bit too big, terenz :P But yes this integral should not converge... Area under the sine curve will never converge... but this may have something to do with the "...in complex analysis" :/
Oh, this was complex analysis? That's beyond my knowledge. Take it away, guys :D
lol i have no idea, I don't remember studying integrals of complex numbers/functions in university calculus.
ahaaa moment of epiphany..thanks terenzreignz
All in a day's work? :D
lol
But that still doesn't change the fact that the area under a sine/cosine curve is unbounded...
Yeah... that's why I was careful and said I'd take it at face value... whatever that means, LOL
yea this doesn't converge. this is called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_principal_value
I thought that's because the total area of under the sine curve on the right is equal to the area on the left and hence the can cancel out\[\int\limits^r_{-r}\]
^yeah, I'm guessing that's what it's getting at. Idk anything about the cauchy principal value thought.
no they don't ... both are indeterminate.
Honestly...wish complex numbers did not exist...they do really make things more.....complex.. :D
I do think complex number makes life easier. :P
^^ agree with agostino
i guess I do agree to an extent but all the studying.... blurgh...
yeah yeah ... currently I am also stuck on complex analysis.
I feel for you..
what book are you following?
I'm studying from a university published book-the open univeristy
i don't know what it is.
I'm studying thorugh distant learning/home-schooling.. In the UK we have a univeristy called the Open University which caters for distant learning students...so i am doing my maths degree with them..and they have provided all the materials of study
Oh .. i know that OU.
:) So what book do you use?
http://books.google.com/books/about/Complex_Variables.html?id=9zKl4lXEXlsC&redir_esc=y currently looking this
Anyone uses Springer's books?
@experimentX just had a look through an online version of the book... imho it is better explained and set out than the book im studying from... thanks for introducing..will definitely be using it. @agostino never used it.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!