- Can someone explain this differentiation concept to me please?
Lets say we are differentiating x^2 + xy^5 - 6x^3y + y^4 How do you differentiate with respect to just X or just Y? For example, if you do with respect to X, does Y just become a constant?
it depends on the nature of the problem, there is implicit as well as partial differentiations
My apologies, this is implicit.
is it a partial differentiation if so yes u treat y as constant
if we assume that y is a function of x, then we use the chain rule. if we assume that x and y are independant variables ... then then are considered to be constants relative to each other
So can I ask a question?
you can
Lets say we are asked to find the equation of the tangent line to curve x^2 + 3xy^2 + y^3 = 5
x^2 +3x.[Y(x)]^2 +[Y(x)]^3 = 5 is correct ?
forget that the variables are named x and y, run thru the power rule, product rule, and constant rule as you would normally apply them.
and yes, that is a proper interpretation
My lecturer then writes : 2x + 3x.(2y.dy/dx) + y^2(3) + 3y^2.dy/dx = 0
dy/dx clutters things up, just denote it a y'
How does y^2(3) come ?
y^3 power rule, drop the exponent and subtract one \[\frac d{dx}y^3=\frac {d(y)}{dx}3y^2=3y^2~y'\]
or, maybe that is attached to the product rule ... let me try that reasoning since i prolly looked at the wrong one
\[\frac d{dx}3xy^2=\frac {d(x)}{dx}3y^2+\frac {d(y)}{dx}6xy=3y^2+6xy~y'\]
yeah, product rule
uv' + vu' 3x = u (2y.y') = v' y^2(3) = v 3y^2 = u' ?
u = 3x u' = 3 v = y^2 v' = 2y y'
2x + 3x.(2y.y') + y^2(3) + 3y^2.y'
I'm still a little confused where the last 3y^2 comes from?
y^3 ,power rule
[y(x)]^2 = y^2(3)
So x becomes 3?
x doesnt "become anything. lets work this as a chain rule \[[y(x)]^3=3[y(x)]^2~*~y'(x)\]
the (x) parts are implied therefore y^3 = 3y^2 y'
implied = constant? (zero)?
implied simply means that the value of y is dependant upon the value of x by some rule that cannot be easily algebrated out
to imply that y is a function of x is to assume y = y(x)
if y was not dependant upon x for its value, then y and x would have no relationship and be constant relative to each other. it is implied that when i close the door on the refridgerator, that the light turns off. The state of the light is implied by the state of the door. Should we imply that when I turn on the water faucet that the light in the refridgerator turns on or off? no, then the state of the light is not implied by the state of the water faucet and any change in the rates have no effect on the rate of change in the other
I understand! Amazing explanation :)
Not the first time you've helped me amistre, thank you so much
:)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!