Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (walters):

prove the following using the identities (P->Q) ^ (Q->P) equivalent to (P v Q)->(P ^ Q)

OpenStudy (walters):

@terenzreignz HELP

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[(p\to q)\wedge(q\to p)\equiv(p\vee q)\to(p\wedge q)~~~?\]

OpenStudy (walters):

YES

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you supposed to do this with truth tables, or just apply some other known identities?

OpenStudy (walters):

apply known identities

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm, one that comes to mind is \(p\to q\equiv \neg ~p\vee q\). So the left side is the same as \[(\neg~p\vee q)\wedge(\neg ~ q \vee p)\] Does this resemble any other identities you know?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You may also wish to use the same identity to express the right side differently: \[(\neg~p\vee q)\wedge(\neg ~ q \vee p)\stackrel{?}\equiv\neg(p\vee q)\vee(p\wedge q)\\ (\neg~p\vee q)\wedge(\neg ~ q \vee p)\stackrel{?}\equiv(\neg ~p\wedge \neg~q)\vee(p\wedge q)\] I think one of DeMorgan's laws might work here, if I recall them correctly...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not DeMorgan's, sorry. The distributive ones. Sorry, I haven't studied this stuff in a while :P

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Sorry... I must have dozed off :(

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!