There is an old joke that goes something like this: “If God is love, love is blind, and Ray Charles is blind, then Ray Charles is God.” Explain, in the terms of first-order logic and predicate calculus, why this reasoning is incorrect. If the person who told you this joke was your grandmother, how would you respectfully explain this to her?
If a then b is not the same as If b then a. For example, If it rains today then I will carry my umbrella is not the same as If I carry my umbrella then it will rain today In your problem a=God is Love and B=Love is Blind We then have if "God is Love" Then "Love Is Blind" which is not the same as If "Love is Blind" Then "God is Love" A simple truth table will show that these two are not equivalent, since If a then b is logically the same as "a or not b" |dw:1377376849913:dw|
Correction to the above: If a then b is not a or not b http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional Here's the corrected truth table |dw:1377377418245:dw| But for grandma, the umbrella explanation would be better.
Correction #2: If a then b is equivalent to "not a or b"
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!