Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 25 Online
OpenStudy (wolfe8):

I need a confirmation. Do I just sketch and label or is there a more complicated way to show this? (picture)

OpenStudy (wolfe8):

OpenStudy (john_es):

I think, assuming e_1, e_2 and e_3 are the canonical cartesian basis, you must express the cylindrical position vector in cartesians. So you must calculate. Also I think is as @Jemurray3 says, but you must know the expression of the scalar product of the unitary vectors in the right side.

OpenStudy (john_es):

Well, also it should be easier to sketch it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I would just draw it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

^ Made a mistake in the above, so I am editing: If you want to be explicit, recognize that in the x-y plane, \[ \hat r \cdot \hat x = \cos(\phi)\] \[\hat r \cdot \hat y = \sin(\phi) \] So the vector in x-y plane could be expressed as \[ \vec{r} = r\cos(\phi) \hat x + r\sin(\phi) \hat y\]

OpenStudy (wolfe8):

So I sketched it. Is it right that I wrote: Magnitude along x-axis = r cos (phi) y-axis = r sin (phi) z-axis = z And then wrote: So the position vector in cylindrical will be the magnitude dotted with the unit vectors for cylindrical coordinates.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You don't need that last bit -- the vector is equal to the projection of the vector onto each axis times the corresponding basis vector.

OpenStudy (wolfe8):

Alright thanks!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!