Kelly and Daniel wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct?
Select one: a. Both Kelly and Daniel are correct. b. Neither Kelly or Daniel is correct. c. Kelly is correct, but Daniel is not. d. Daniel is correct, but Kelly is not.
yay help me guys
dont u feel Kelly's proof is silly
kelly has used to prove what needs to be proved! thats illegal...
when she's asked to prove vertical angles are congruent, she is using whatever she wants to prove to prove - which is a crime... yup she muse be punished by every possible law in geometry !
ok wats the answer
so is Kelly incorrect
daniel's proof is legitimate, he is just using the postulates, theorems and stuff to prove ...
so only Daniel is correct and not kelly
you're right, daniel proof is correct, kelly's proof is bogus
ok thnx one more question
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!