Question

Olivia wrote the following indirect proof:
Prove: 17 is a factor of 323.
Step 1: Assume that 17 is not a factor of 323.
Step 2: 323 divided by 17 is 19.
Step 3: A factor is an integer by which another integer is divisible.
Step 4: Therefore, 17 cannot be a factor of 323.

Answer 1

Which step in Olivia's proof is incorrect?

Answer 2

Select one:
a. Step 1
b. Step 2
c. Step 3
d. Step 4

Answer 3

@ganeshie8 I need ur help again please

Answer 4

@sauravshakya can you help me please

Answer 5

step 4 is wrong

Answer 6

so is that the answer D

Answer 7

Because 323 is divisible by 17 and your assumtion is wrong so 17 is a factor of 323

Answer 8

ya

Answer 9

thnx I have one more don't leave

Answer 10

im about to post it here

Answer 11

@sauravshakya

Answer 12

The figure shows triangle ABC with medians AF, BD, and CE. Segment AF is extended to H in such a way that segment GH is congruent to segment AG.

Answer 13

Which conclusion can be made based on the given conditions?

Answer 14

Select one:
a. Segment GF is congruent to segment EG.
b. Segment GF is half the length of segment EB.
c. Segment GD is congruent to segment EG.
d. Segment GD is half the length of segment HC.

Answer 15

@sauravshakya I need ur help again

Answer 16

@ganeshie8 can u help me please

Answer 17

I think it is the 3rd choice.

Answer 18

r u sure

Answer 19

@Edge which one was the answer for one?

Answer 20

The second one is D i believe