How do I rewrite the limit part in terms of the substitution.
I need to know how to write the part for the approach section. ex \[\lim_{x \rightarrow a} \frac{\sqrt{x}-a}{x-a}\] If I sub root (x) with u how do I write \[\lim_{u \rightarrow ?}\]
thats ax+b, right ? and x->0 let y= ax+b , when x->0 , y-> a(0)+b, y->b
O alright ok. Thanks so I just make that y = a() + b so y approc b
\[m_{y \rightarrow b} \frac{(\sqrt{y}-2)a}{u-b}\] now I am even more stuck
you mean y-b in the denom, right ?
yes
The step you did here I wouldn't even have done. The limit exist when you have 0/0, right? So to find what b is set x=0.
In the numerator.
how do I do that?
sqrt(a(0)+b)-2=0 I set the top equal to 0 and set x equal to 0 because x approaches 0.
After you find b, try rationalizing the top for your journey to find a.
\[\lim _{\xrightarrow 0} \frac{\sqrt{ax-b}-2}{x} =1 \] wait wait wait wait.... you just did what. I aready changed the number stuff. first if I write the limit in terms of y.. y approaches b as x aproches0
The limit exist when you have 0/0.
mebs, listen to myin, you can get b easily without doing any of that
so then approaches x
x approaches 0
o ok
\[\sqrt{a(0)+b}-2=0\]
I want to know when the top is 0 for when x is 0. I want the top to be zero because I want 0/0. I put x as 0 because x approaches 0.
so \[b = 2^{2}\]
Yep.
But that's cheating. You can't do that if it is supposed to be 0/0 even though you know it equals 1 .
Now look at your whole problem where b is 4 and let's find a. Hint: You will need to do some rationalizing.
How is that cheating?
because you just let an undefined value equal and let it equal 2 then squared it for b even though its undefined. 2/0
We know the limit exist so we know we must have 0/0.
We don't have 2/0
alright so I guess its clever.
It is 0/0.
the concept is, since the limit existed, and the denominator =0 the denominator should also have a factor of that leads to 0 there's only one factor in numerator = \sqrt {...}-2 so that must =0 else if the num NOT =0, the limit won't exist.
So now I just evaluate \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{\sqrt{ax +4}-2}{x}\]
You would go about it like you are evaluating it now. You would rationalize the top.
so like the above part or the substitution part?
Or use l'hospital I wouldn't even use a sub.
I am not allowed to use l'hoptial ....I haven't learned it in class =(
rationalizing is easier than substitution
Yep then use rationalizing.
I'm not saying you can't use a sub. I'm just saying I wouldn't.
so just multiply the top and bottom by \[\frac{\sqrt{ax+4}+2}{\sqrt{ax+4}+2}\]
Yes.
no...
I meant that b = 4 and
well I get a/4
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{\sqrt{ax+4}-2}{x} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{ax+4}+2}{\sqrt{ax+4}+2}=\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{(ax+4)-4}{x(\sqrt{ax+4}+2)}\] Ok good/ a/4 So a/4=1
That wouldn't make a 1 or -1.
alright that was nice.. thanks
Great. I have seen that question a dozen times now on openstudy. lol.
Sometimes we did l'hospital and other times we did rationalizing.
Alright time to attempt similar problems... I hope you guys are still around until I get it haha thanks @hartnn and @myininaya
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!