The La Suerte family has 13 members. They plan to use their 13-seater van during a trip. Family members who know how to drive must occupy the front seats. Children should occupy the next two rows while the other members should be seated at the back. In how many ways will the family members be seated if only three of them know how to drive and 6 of them are children? The van has 4 rows with three seats each row for the first three rows, and 4 seats at the back row.
"The van has 4 rows with three seats each row for the first three rows" in front: 3 seats per row "only three of them know how to drive" so, the 3 that know how to drive are always in the front row also nobody else is there see above For the first row, there are 3 people and 3 seats, they are always the same but they can change seats in some combinations.
@mathessentials I still don't understand it...
OK do you understand what is in my post though?
@mathessentials Yeah.
so we have to get this to the form of choosing marbles from a pot.... because that's the form combinatorics work with. I guess we can say "first pick" will be the same like "person one gets" in the marble and pot problem there are different possible scenarios which one is picked "first". similarly, there are different scenarios which seat will be used by "person one". In the marble problem, there are 3 picks. Here there are also 3 picks for the 3 seats, just we don't care about "first, second, third" we care about "driver1, driver2, driver3" but it is the same structure for combinatorics
In the marble problem, first pick can have marble1,marble2,marble3 here, the driver1 can get seat1, seat2, seat3 same amount of combinations/possible ways
The front row is a 3 choose 3 scenario are you familiar with "choose" in combinatorics?
@mathessentials Yes, it should be 3C3?
yes. it's also without replacement. a seat is taken and no longer available when it is being chosen.
@mathessentials What's next?
Next, you do similar reasoning for the remaining rows in the van. also, the # of ways of each row are finally multiplied together for 1,2,3 and A, B 1,2,3 - A 1,3,2 - A 2,1,3 -A 2,3,1 -A 3,1,2 -A 3,2,1 -A 1,2,3 -B 1,3,2 -B ... just as many again, so whatever combinations for 1,2,3 times the combinations of A,B in this example
sorry, 3C3 is wrong in n choose k, order doesn't matter for us order matters since I said first pick <=> first driver second pick <=> second driver etc. it matters in which order and so it must be something else
must be a permutation instead because position of the drivers matters
ok? :)
\[permutations:\frac{ n! }{ \left( n-r \right)! }\]with no repetition with order matters n is the number of things to choose from (seats in front row =3) r is the number of things you choose (3 seats for 3 drivers, =3)
^ this is for the first row part then there's the rows 2,3 for the children In that part of the problem there are: 6 seats to choose from how often? for 6 children to go for each seat !! it is a permutation though, NOT 6C6 !!
@mathessentials So its 6P6?
Yes :) 6P6 with "no repetiton" for 2nd part of the problem
3P3 for first part of the problem
--Family members who know how to drive must occupy the front seats. Children should occupy the next two rows "three of them know how to drive" first row all drivers "and 6 of them are children" rows 2+3 all children no child allowed in row 4 illegal permutation
so that just leaves 3P3 and 6P6, since there is no empty seat and hard requirements
... for the drivers and children. Then we also need the remaining passengers.
@mathessentials What is the final equation for the problem?
well the third part is the remaining passengers and remaining seats remaining passengers: 13-3 drivers - 6children = 13 -9 = 4 other and there's 13-seater -3-6 = 4 seats I think everyone not child or driver should be in back row: 4P4
and then we need to combine the 3P3, 6P6 and 4P4
@mathessentials Add them?
I think we should multiply them because we care about the total seating in the van, like, if children and passengers remained the same but two drivers change position, the whole situation was changed the seating should be a sequence of driver seating, children, passengers they depend on each other to be unique
"In how many ways will the family members be seated "
if you add them you basically get the options a person has the # of different seats he can get
@mathessentials But if we multiply them the answer is 103680..
simple example: ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´ front: 1,2,3 back: A, B combinations front: 1,2,3&1,3,2&... (6 combinations) combinations back: A,B & B,A (2 combinations) combined unique different scenarios: 6 times A,B and 6 times B,A if we added them 1,2,3 A, B 1,3,2 B, A 2,1,3 2,3,1 3,1,2 3,2,1 they wouldn't have much to do with each other they would be separate, isolated choices
I think you should only add if it is different cases like you can go to bakery and choose from 3 breads or go to supermarket and choose from 2 toast total possible choices: 5 total choices the different 3/2 have nothing to do with each other
but they are both possible so add them
new example|dw:1382274862708:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!