prove that the set of all integers is not a vector space
do you know what conditions must be satisfied for a set to be considered a vector space ?
that was the whole question
the question most likely is relevant to what you've learned in class. what have you learned in class with respect to a vector space ?
i.e., closure rules
one sec
its just general vector spaces and subspaces and linear combinations of vectors
the closure axiom is part of that section
i'd say the set of integers isn't a vector space because the set of integers isn't closed under scalar multiplication
well how do i prove that
it's hard to say. it depends on how you define scalar. if we take all real numbers to be scalars, then any fraction added to an integer results in a fraction (and not an integer). but your question is confusing since the set of integers is closed under + and *
because vectors are closed under division, and integers are not, then the integers do not form a vector space. for proof, take an odd integer and divide it by 2. your result is a number that is not an integer
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!