@nurali @bookworm00981 what can you conclude about the Quakers? They did not believe in hard work. They were against formal schooling. They believed in a culture of diversity. They were not accepting of other cultures.
hope i helped you
yea big time ..thanks :)
haha yw
You've probably heard a conversation like this between members and attenders of the modern, unprogrammed Religious Society of Friends: "What do Friends believe? Or, basically, what do I have to believe to join Friends?" "Oh, don't worry. Friends have no creed. You can believe anything you want in our meeting. All religions are saying the same thing, only in different words. There are many ways to Truth and all religions lead to God. That's why we see the Bible as just one great book among many. We see that of God in every person, that Divine Spark, that little piece of God, in each of us." "Well, is there anything I have to do?" "You might say Friends are rugged spiritual individualists. However, all Friends embrace the Peace Testimony." "How do you get anything done if your meetings are full of rugged individualists?" "Easy. We work by consensus in our business meetings." This conversation reflects several perspectives widely embraced by people in the United States in general, and by unprogrammed Quakers in particular. Each view is often held and expressed by people who consider themselves to be right-thinking, well-educated, and well-read individuals. Yet, when one investigates each claim, one finds each is based on vague thinking, factual errors, and remarkable ignorance. They are misinterpretations of faith in general, and Quaker faith and practice in particular, misinterpretations that lead toward mindless faith and unmindful action—and even lead us to view people of other faiths as bigots.
I conclude that they make some mean Oatmeal.
Hahahaahaha
:P
wooooooooooooooooooooo oatmeal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lol
LOL
I think they make fruit bars too...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!