Prove that \(z=tan(\frac{\pi}{10})\) is a root of \(5z^5-5iz^4-10z^3-10iz^2+z-i=0\). I simplified it to \((5z^4-10z^2+1)(z-i)=0\), but I'm just not sure from here.
So, if we plug it into the quadratic: \[z^2=\frac{10\left(\begin{matrix}+ \\ -\end{matrix}\right) \sqrt{80}}{10}\]
So we get the 4 roots from \[z=\left(\begin{matrix}+ \\ -\end{matrix}\right) \sqrt{\frac{10\left(\begin{matrix}+ \\ -\end{matrix}\right) \sqrt{80}}{10}}\]
@satellite73 , any ideas?
hmm i am still at your step, solving the 4th degree equation i wonder if there is some half or double angle identity to use any clue? as in what the topic for the class is?
oh i have an idea not saying it is right write it in polar form and see if it checks
did you try working with \[5(z^2-1)^2-4=0\]?
not sure that helps \[(z^2-1)^2=\frac{4}{5}\] \[z^2-1=\pm\frac{2}{\sqrt5}\]
at least that proves that \(z^2\) is real, not sure where to go from there
How do you get that factorization?
I think there is something off about it unless I multiplied and divided wrong.
I'm talking about what fibs did
\[5z^4-10z^2+1=5(z^24-2z^2)+1=5(z^4-2z^2+1)+1-5=5(z^2-1)^2-4\]
ok typo there, but you get the idea not sure how it help, but is seems to nice to be a coincidence
was it suppose to be \[5z^5-5iz^4-10z^3+10iz^2+z-i=0\]?
ooh are you saying the initial factorization is wrong? i didn't check ti
yep i said fibs maybe i should have spelled out Fibonacci
I think he meant that one part to be + instead - with it being - there is actually no real solutions (i cheated and used wolfram)
oh i see lets wolfram
btw, i assume that even though fibonacci was a guy, fibonacci chick is probably a woman
oops i don't check last names my bad
anyway i am stuck
so I guess we need to somehow prove \[\tan(\pi/10)=\sqrt{1-\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}}\]
if we can prove this then maybe we can work backwards
it is right, according to the wolf
lol want to work through this? http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/196067/how-to-calculate-the-exact-value-of-tan-frac-pi10
so sorry guys, i was afk
i bet there is a snappier way, but i sure don't know it probably write the solution as \(z^2=1-\frac{2}{\sqrt5}\) and then make some argument (pun intended) about what \(z^2\) has to be in polar form
topic is complex variables
lol, got that
also there must be a typo in the question before the factorization but no matter we got to \[(z^2-1)^2=\frac{4}{5}\] making \[z^2=1\pm\frac{2}{\sqrt5}\] which does in fact make \(z=\tan(\frac{\pi}{10})\)
Sorry again, I was thinking about applying Cauchy Integral Theorem somehow
the issue is pi,
@Zarkon was here a second ago, he teaches this stuff
but so, let me check real quick, the factorization may be wrong, but the initial problem is right
i think the initial is wrong and the factorization is right, because the solution is right to the factored one
That is what I was going to say. Took the words out of my mouth.
nope, the initial is right, I just checked it against the problem
That would lead to all imaginary solutions then
therefore tan(pi/10) could not possibly be a root
it's weird I know That's what is partially messing with me
\[5z^5-5iz^4-10z^3+10iz^2+z-i=0 \] This is what I'm thinking what was meant.
not possible wolf has 5 complex solutions to the original http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+5z^5%E2%88%925iz^4%E2%88%9210z^3%E2%88%9210iz^2%2Bz%E2%88%92i%3D0. but exactly the right solution to the factored one http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan%28pi%2F10%29
hmm if we redistribute the z-i which do we get, then let's go with that and say my teacher wrote the problem wrong
When you multiply it you get the equation I wrote above.
Let's say it's wrong and you are right(because most likely you are)
There is just a one single difference between the questions there is a + in front of the 10iz^2
I agree, what if I wrote the factorization wrong and it's a plus?
well that factorization you wrote is correct for the + version
then I don't get the minus i
ok so i'm convinced,
I was incorrect, thank you for that... it explains so much
But I'm not sure if I can actually be help to this problem. I would have to do some reading.
so far i am at \[\cos(2\theta)=1\pm\frac{2}{\sqrt5}\]
actually, I think @satellite73 's factorization might do the trick, if I can prove that \(tan(\pi/10)=\sqrt{1(+/-)\frac2 {\sqrt5}}\)
you can i have provided a link to the proof
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/196067/how-to-calculate-the-exact-value-of-tan-frac-pi10 but i bet there is another way, using complex numbers as this method only uses real numbers
then, obviously it's a root right?
well, i was thinking about using CIT and then having a be tan(pi/10)
making it =0
then using squeeze to equal zero
but i just don't know how to apply it
i would go with just using numbers but i could be wrong without a similar example worked out, i am not sure how to proceed
i like yours better
a lot better
do you mind best answering @myininaya for me @satellite73 , she deserves a medal too
i bet @Zarkon has a better method
we'll see when he gets back can you check mine in a min?
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/7695/how-to-prove-cos-frac2-pi-5-frac-1-sqrt54 I want to use the complex way, but I don't understand the series
I don't see a slick way of doing it. What you did is fine
How did they write z=1+z+z^2+z^3+z^4=0?
Thank you @Zarkon
oops \(tan\theta=\frac{z-z^{-1}}{z+z^{-1}}\)
\(z=e^\frac{i\pi}{10}\)
@satellite73 , do you know how they did the series?
ok i got the expansion, but why can i make the expansion?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!