Can someone out there check my understanding of how Integrals/ Sigma Notation works? A have a (tidy) sketch outlining my inquiry on the following link: http://www.twiddla.com/1504676 Any and all help is greatly appreciated! :)
I know.... Everyone's favorite, right ;)
I see nothing...
*damn it
I see your green line! :)
(Of top of the picture)
Now???
Nothing, eh?
equation editor > hand drawn crap :P doesn't take long if you copy and past things like sigma\[\Large \sum_{k=1}^{n}(a_k +1) = \sum_{k=1}^{n}a_k -1\]
what would make you think that is true, though?
...I'm not too sure. I don't know what it's all supposed to equal, if the integral/sigma thing of just asubk = 0, but I know you move coefficients outside, so I thought perhaps you should do the same with other non-variable terms.
since you're just adding 1 to each term, this is true\[\Large \sum_{k=1}^{n}(a_k +1) = \sum_{k=1}^{n}a_k +n\]
Gotta.... Alright, I see that... So then would (sigmathing of asubk) + n = the left side of the equals sign, in your post? My original problem/ integral?
er... what?
Does, referring to your second to least post, the left side of the equals sign = "n" , because (sigma-thing of a sub k) = 0, & the original one I'm using = (sigma(asubk)) + n ? So... If I'm understanding your second to last post correctly, it's: "0 + n" = n
Just copy and paste what i wrote, into the equation editor. It's worth learning. If the term a is zero, then it's sum is obv zero.
What's the equation editor? :/
The thing that comes up when you click the Equation button...
Haha, I must be really missing out on the OS experience man... Apparently my iPad (iOS & Mobile combined) is cutting out parts of the site. I have yet to lay eyes on such a beautiful feature!
Ah, yeah no wonder you're making drawings :P
It's okay, I'll bug my teacher again tomorrow. You've been helpful, and thank you for that! :)
Yeah, drawings & "longhand" algebra. Ick
To bed I go... Have a good night!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!